Undergraduate Students Willingness to Pay for Social Services of Trees at the Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria

Main Article Content

P. U. Ancha
E. T. Ikyaagba
T. T. Nongov

Abstract

The study was conducted to provide information on students Willingness to Pay (WTP) for social services provided by tree species on the campus of the Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi (FUAM), Benue State, Nigeria. Random sampling technique was used to select 200 students from 10 Departments of the University. The semi-structured questionnaire was used to obtain data from the students. Vegetation survey was conducted to indentified tree species present in the selected colleges. The result of the study shows that Albizia zygia was the dominant tree species on the campus. Majority of the students (86.5%) were willing to pay (WTP) for social services of the tree species while (23.5%) were not WTP. Provision of shade (WMS= 4.19>3.00) and beautification (WMS=3.64>3.00) were the most social services provided by tree species. The mean amount the students were WTP for social tree services was N46 per month. Sex of the students differed significantly (P<0.05) from their WTP for the trees social services. Also, there was a significant difference (P<0.10) between the students level of study and their willingness to pay for the trees social services. The major reasons responsible for the insufficiency of trees on the campus as stated by the students were clearance for construction purposes (WMS4.15>3.00) and bush burning (WMS=3.62>3.00). It was recommended that harnessing of human, financial and material resources to address issues of sustainability of forest goods and services on the campus of FUAM should be prioritized. School administration, Departmental Staff and students should promote tree planting on campus.

Keywords:
Students, willingness to pay, social services, trees, University

Article Details

How to Cite
Ancha, P. U., Ikyaagba, E. T., & Nongov, T. T. (2019). Undergraduate Students Willingness to Pay for Social Services of Trees at the Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi, Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 9(5), 273-286. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2019/v9i530114
Section
Original Research Article

References

Adekunle MF, Momoh S, Agbaje BM. Valuing urban forests: The application of contingent valuation methods. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management. 2008;1(2):61-67.

Agbogidi OM, Eshegbeyi OF. Forestry development for a safe environment. In: Onykwelu JC, Adekunle VAJ, Oke DO. (eds.). Research for development in forestry, forest products and natural resources management. Proceedings of the 1st national conference of the forests and forest products society of Nigerian (FFPN) held at the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State. 2008;95-98.

Bishop JT. (ed). Valuing forest: A review of methods and application in developing countries International Institute for Environment and Development, London (LLED); 1998.

Emery MR. Invisible livelihoods: Non-timber forest products in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula. Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick; 1998.

Ajewole OI. Economic valuation of environmental service functions of forest in Ibadan metropolis. Department of Forest Resources Management, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. 2001;1(2):2-16.

Hein L. Economics benefits generated by protected areas: the case of Hoge Veluwe forest, the Netherlands: Ecology and Society. International day for biological diversity, 2011. Forest Biodiversity: Earth’s living Treasure. Published by the Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. 2011;16.
Available:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art13

United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). Global biological diversity assessment. Annex 6, Convention of Biodiversity; 1995.

Israel and Levinson. Willingness to pay for environmental quality: Testable empirical implications of the growth and environment literature. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, the Berkeley Electronic Press; 2004.
Available:http://www.bepress.com/bejeap

Tsi EA, Ajaga N, Wiegleb G, Mühlenberg M. The willingness to pay (WTP) for the conservation of wild animals: Case of the derby eland (Taurotragus derbianus gigas) and the African wild dog (Lycaon pictus) in North Cameroon. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2008;2(3):051-058.
Available:http://www.academicjournals.org/AJest

Carson RT, Wright JL, Carson NJ, Alberini A, Flores NE. A bibliography of contingent valuation studies and papers. La Jolla, CA: NRDA, Inc; 1995.

Jabarin AS, Damhoureyeh SA. Estimating the recreational benefits of Dibeen National Park in Jordan using contingent valuation and travel cost methods. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2006;9(12):2198-2206.

Nielsen AB, Olsen SB, Lundhede T. An economic valuation of the recreational benefits associated with nature-based forest management practices. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2007;80:63-71.

Rambonilaza T, Brahic E. Non-market values of forest biodiversity and the impact of informing on the general public: Insights from generalized multinomial logit estima-tions. Environ. Sci. Policy. 2016;64:93- 100.

Tilahun M, Mathijs E, Muys B, Vranken L, Deckers J, Gebregziabher K, Gebrehiwot K, Bauer H. Contingent valuation analysis of rural households’ willingness to pay for frankincense forest conservation. EAAE 2011 Congress Change and Uncertainty Challenges for Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources August 30 to September 2, 2011 ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 2011.

Kamri T. Willingness to pay for conserva-tion of natural resources in the Gunung Gading National Park, Sarawak. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;101:506-515.

Tisdell C, Wilson C. Knowledge and willingness to pay for the conservation of wildlife species: Experimental results evaluating Australian tropical species. Working Paper; 2004.
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37621717

Law MC. Willingness to pay for the control of water hyacinth in an urban environment of South Africa’, Master’s thesis, Rhodes University; 2008.

Tessema W, Holden S. Soil degradation, poverty, and farmers willingness to invest in soil conservation: A case from a Highland in Southern Ethiopia. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on the Ethiopian Economy, 2:147-164. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Ethiopian Economic Association; 2006.

Ajewole OI, Popoola L. Monetization of forest service functions for sustainable forest management. Journal of Environ-mental Extension, University of Ibadan. 2001;1(1):7-21.

Popoola L, Ajewole O. Willingness to pay for rehabilitation of Ibadan urban environment through reforestation projects. International Journal of Sustainable Development. 2002;9(2):5-23.

Adekunle MF. Economic valuation of forest plants used in traditional treatment of guinea worm (Dracunculus medinesis Linn) infections in Ogun State, Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, University of Agriculture Abeokuta. 2005;199.

Adekunle MF, Adedokun MO, Adedoja AA. Willingness to pay for environmental service of forest trees by cooperate organizations. Paper presented at the Farm Management Association of Nigerian Conference, Jos, Nigeria; 2006.

Adekunle MF, Agbaje BM. Public willingness to pay for ecosystem service functions of a Peri-urban forest in Abeokuta. Proceedings of the Environ-mental Management Conference, Held at the Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, College of Environmental Resources Management. Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria; 2011.

Samuel CO, Tee NT, Ancha PU. Residents of neighborhoods willingness to pay for park development in Makurdi metropolis, Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 2019;8(3):12-18.
Available:www.ijird.com

Dagba BI, Azeez IO, Ancha PU. Assessment of community based forest management practices in Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology. 2017; 11(2):1-13.

Nikodinoska N, Foxcroft LC, Rouget M, Paletto A, Notaro S. Tourists’ perceptions and willingness to pay for the control of Opuntia stricta invasion in protected areas: A case study from South Africa’, Koedoe. 2014;56(1):1-8.
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v56i1.1214

Mustapha A. Application of Mann-Whitney U test non-parametric statistical tool to temperature variation in Kano metropolitan, Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Environmental Studies Research. 2013;1(3):69-76.
Available:www.seahipub.org

Endalew B, Wondimagegnhu BS. Determinants of households’ willingness to pay for the conservation of church forests in Northwestern Ethiopia: A contingent valuation study. Cogent Environmental Science. 2019;5:1-14.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2019.1570659

Kesiena TO, Saka OJ, Opeyemi IA. Willingness to pay for environmental service function of mangrove forest in Uzere, Delta State, Nigeria. Journal of Resources Development and Manage-ment. 2014;16:1-7.
Available:www.iiste.org

Kenneth GW, Guy G, Riccardo S, Neil P, Andrew L, Ian JB, Nick H, Douglas CM. The social and environmental benefits of forests In Great Britain, Phase 2. Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal and Management University of Newcastle; 2004.
Available:www.forestry.uk.gov/sustainableforestry

Bösch M, Elsasser P, Franz K, Lorenz M, Moning C, Olschewski R, Rödl A, Schneider H, Schröppel B, Weller P. Forest ecosystem services in rural areas of Germany: Insights from the national TEEB study. Ecosystem Service. 2018;31:77– 83.

Getzner M, Meyerhoff J, Schläpfer F. Willingness to pay for nature conservation policies in state-owned forests: An Austrian case study. Forests Forests. 2018;9:537.
Available:www.mdpi.com/journal/forests

Adetola BO, Adedire OP. Visitors’ motivation and willingness to pay for con-servation in selected Zoos in Southwest Nigeria. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental. Management. 2018;22(4): 531-537.
Available:https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jasem

Ikyaagba ET, Ancha PU, Ojebade JW, Gbande S, Adia JE. Environmental conservation awareness among secondary school students in Makurdi local govern-ment area of Benue State, Nigeria. 2018; 6(1):8-17.
Available:https://www.academicresearchjournals.org/ARJB/Index.htm

Trumper R. How do learners in developed and developing countries relate to environ-mental issues? Science Education Inter-national. 2010;21(4):217–240.

Jaina A, Chandrab G, Nautiyalb R. Valuating intangible benefits from afforested areas: A case study in India. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales. 2017;17(1):89-100.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). Ecosystem and human well-being synthesis island press. Washington D. C. USA; 2005.

Nigerian Environmental Study/Action Team (NEST), The challenge of Sustainable Development in Nigeria, T. Nest Ibadan; 1991.

Iwara AI, Deekor TN, Njar GN. Effect of farming activities on tree diversity, density and community structure in Agoi-Ekpo, Cross River State, Nigeria. Nova Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences. 2014;2(2):1-7.

Aweto AO. Trees in shifting and continuous cultivation farms in Ibadan area, Southwestern Nigeria. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2001;53(3):22-30.

Makana JR, Thomas SC. Impacts of selective logging and agricultural clearing on forest structure, floristic composition and diversity, and timber tree regeneration in the Ituri forest, Democratic Republic of Congo. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2006;15:1375-1397.

Jonkers WBJ. Vegetation structure, logging damage and silviculture in tropical rainforests in Suriname. The Netherlands Agricultural University, Wageningen; 1988.

Kasenene JM, Murphy PG. Post-logging mortality and major branch losses in Kibale forest, Uganda. Forest Ecology and Management. 1991;46:295-307.