Comparison of Different Methods in Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration at Gaya District of Bihar, India

I. Singh *

Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, VIAET, SHUATS, Prayagraj, India.

A. K. Mishra

Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, VIAET, SHUATS, Prayagraj, India.

S. Suryavanshi

Department of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, VIAET, SHUATS, Prayagraj, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET), a complex mechanism in the hydrological cycle, influences runoff, which in turn influences how much water is required for irrigation. There are many techniques available to calculate of the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Unfortunately, most efficient reference evapotranspiration approaches are parameter-rich models, making them unsuitable for use in data-scarce locations. On the other hand, accuracy and reliability of simple ETo models vary widely according to regional climate conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of two temperature-based and three radiation-based simple ET methods in estimating ET algorithms used to forecast the wheat crop for the years 2017–2018 in Gaya District, Bihar. The performance was measured by comparing the temperature and radiation-based method with the parameter intensive Penman-Monteith method. Comparative evaluation of two method (radiation and temperature) was performed through statistical tests, and it was found that the (R2 = 1 and R2 = 0.98) and RMSE = 0.84. The study found that ETo values calculated from the six methods were highly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.84 to 0.99). Through data analysis for model comparison, it was found that the Radiation method performed satisfactorily when compared to the standard Penman-Monteith model estimate (R2 = 0.94). However, multivariate statistical testing revealed that the ETo readings obtained using various techniques differed significantly from one another. In comparison to radiation-based ETo approaches, temperature-based ETo techniques showed greater disparities. The Priestley-Taylor, Turc, and Jensen-Haise methods all outperformed the other ETo methods in general. When estimating ETo in this study region, it was discovered that radiation-based approaches performed better than temperature-based methods.

Keywords: Priestley-Taylor, Jensen-Haise, Hargreaves, Turc, Hargreaves-Samani, Penman-Monteith


How to Cite

Singh, I., Mishra, A. K., & Suryavanshi, S. (2022). Comparison of Different Methods in Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration at Gaya District of Bihar, India. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 12(12), 1149–1157. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i121553

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berti A, Tardivo G, Chiaudani A, Rech F, Borin M. Assessing reference evapotranspiration by the Hargreaves methodin north-eastern Italy. Agric. Water Manag. 2014;140:20–25.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.03.015.

Rawat KS, Singh SK, Bala A, Sazabo S. Estimation of crop evapotranspiration through spatial distributed crop coefficient in a semi-arid environment. Agricultural Water Management. 2019; 213:922-933.

IPCC. Summary for Policymakers. In M. L. Parry O. F. Canziani J. P. Palutik of P. J. van der Linden & C. E. Hanson (Eds.) Climate Change 2007: Impacts Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press Cambridge UK; 2007.

Hargreaves GH, Allen RG. History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2003;129(1):53–63.

Tukimat NN Harun S Shahid S. Comparison of different methods in estimating potential evapotranspiration at Muda Irrigation Scheme of Malaysia. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics (JARTS). 2012 Sep 19;113(1):77-85.

Shahid S. Impacts of climate change on irrigation water demand in Northwestern Bangladesh. Climatic Change. 2011;105 (3-4):433–453.

Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements FAO irrigation and drainage Paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 1998.

Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56 FAO Corporate Document Repository; 1998.

Allen RG, Clemmens AJ, Burt CM, Solomon K, O’Halloran T. Prediction accuracy for projectwide evapotranspiration using crop coefficients and reference evapotranspiration. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2005;131(1):24–36.

Band LE, Mackay DS, Creed IF. Ecosystem processes at the watershed sale: sensitivity to potential climate change. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1996;41(5): 928-938.

Sentelhas PC, Gillespie TJ, Santos EA. Evaluation of FAO Penman–Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario Canada. Agricultural Water Management. 2010;97(5):635–644.

Hay LE, McCabe GJ. Spatial Variability in Water Balance Model Performance in the Conterminous United States. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA). 2002;38(3):847-860.

Burnash RJC. The NWS River forecast system- catchment modeling. In V. P. Singh (Ed.) Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology (pp. 311–366). Water Resources Publications Highlands Ranch CO; 1995.

Currie DJ. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness. The American Naturalist. 1991;137(1):27-49.

Grismer ME, Orang M, Snyder R, Matyac R. Pan evaporation to reference evapotranspiration conversion methods. J. Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 2002;128(3):180-184.

Allen RG, Pruitt WO, Wright JL, Howell TA, Ventura F, Snyder R, Itenfisu D, Steduto P, Berengena J, Yrisarry JB, Smith M, Pereira LS, Raes D, Perrier A, Alves I, Walter I, Elliott R. A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman-Monteith method. Agricultural Water Management. 2006;81 1–22.

Ravazzani G, Corbari C, Morella S, Gianoli P, Mancini M. Modified Hargreaves-Samani equation for the assessment reference evapotranspiration in Alphine River basin. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 2011;138(7):592–599.

Lee KH, Cho HY. Simple method for estimating pan coefficient: Conversion of pan evaporation to reference evapotranspiration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 2012;137(1): 98–103.

Martinez CJ, Thepadia M. Estimating reference evapotranspiration with minimum data in Florida USA. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng. 2010;136(7):494–501.

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000214

Turc L. Estimation of irrigation water requirements potential evapotranspiration: a simple climate formula evolved up to date. Ann. Argon. 1961;12:13–49.

Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG. Evapotranspiration and Water Irrigation Requirements. Committee on Irrigation Water Requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Division of ASCE Manual No. 70 ASCE New York. 1990;329.

Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA. Estimating potential evapotranspiration. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. 1982; 108(3):225–230.

Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl. Eng. Agric. 1985;1(2):96–99.

Priestley CHB, Taylor RJ. On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large scale parameters. Mon. Weather. Rev. 1972;100:81–92.

Jensen ME, Haise HR. Estimating evapotranspiration from solar radiation. PRoc. J. Irrig. Drain. Div. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 1963;89 (IR4):15–41 Closure 91(IR1): 203–205.