G×E analysis to Identify the Stable High-yielding Rice Lines among a Set of Selected Germplasm Panel

Padmashree R.

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India and Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, UAS, Raichur-584104, India.

Vishal Reddy

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India and Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga-577412, India.

Kalyani M. Barbadikar *

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India.

Honnappa M.

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India and Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, UAS, Raichur-584104, India.

Nakul D. Magar

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India.

Divya Balakrishnan

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India.

C. Gireesh

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India.

Anantha M. Siddaiah

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India.

Jyothi Badri

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India.

R. Lokesha

Keladi Shivappa Nayaka University of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Shivamogga-577412, India.

Y. M. Ramesha

Department of Agronomy, ARS Dhadesugur, UAS, Raichur-584167, India.

P. Senguttuvel

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India.

J. R. Diwan

Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, ARS Mugad, UAS, Dharwad-580007, India.

Maganti Sheshu Madhav

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India and Central Tobacco Research Institute, Rajahmundry-533106, India.

R. M. Sundaram

ICAR-Indian Institute Rice Research (IIRR), Hyderabad-500030, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Rice lines need to be grown and evaluated for yield under different agro-ecological locations to identify stable and high-yielding lines for deployment in breeding programs. With this aim, a set of rice germplasm was evaluated for G×E in four different environments (E1-Dadesuguru-Wet 2020, E2-ICAR–IIRR-Dry 2019, E3-ICAR–IIRR-Wet 2020, E4-ICAR–IIRR-Dry 2020). The experimental trial was laid out in a randomized complete block (RCB) design with three replications at each location for 118 rice lines. Data on yield per plant was analyzed using the Additive Main Effect and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) and Genotype, and Genotype × Environment Interaction (GGE) models. The combined analysis of variance (ANOVA) manifested significant variations for tested genotypes, locations, years, genotype × year, and genotype × location interactions revealing the influence of environmental factors on yield traits. All four environments showed discrimination power, whereas E2 and E3 were found as the representative environment as they fall near the Average-Environment axis (AEA). The AMMI biplot PC1 contributed 79.20% variability and PC2 contributed 15.18% variability. From the GGE biplot analysis, the rice lines Phouren, JBB-631-1, and JBB-1325 were found to be the best and most stable. The rice lines Phouren, PUP-229, and TI-112 were stable in the first sub-group Dhadesugur-Wet 2020 (E1). The rice lines Langphou, and NPK-45 were stable in the second sub-group ICAR-IIRR-Wet 2020 (E3). Environment ICAR-IIRR-Dry 2019 (E2) was the third subgroup and the rice lines Moirangphou-Yenthik and TI-3 topped for the same. The ICAR IIRR-Dry 2020 (E4) environment formed the fourth subgroup where Phouren-Amubi, TI-128 and JBB-1325 topped the season. In conclusion, this study revealed that G × E interactions are significant for yield variation, and its AMMI and biplots analysis are efficient tools for visualizing the response of genotypes to different locations.

Keywords: Rice, AMMI, G × E interaction, stability


How to Cite

R., P., Reddy, V., Barbadikar, K. M., M., H., Magar, N. D., Balakrishnan, D., Gireesh, C., Siddaiah, A. M., Badri, J., Lokesha, R., Ramesha, Y. M., Senguttuvel, P., Diwan, J. R., Madhav, M. S., & Sundaram, R. M. (2023). G×E analysis to Identify the Stable High-yielding Rice Lines among a Set of Selected Germplasm Panel. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(7), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i71849

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Islam MR, Sarker MR, Sharma N, Rahman MA, Collard BC, Gregorio GB, Ismail AM. Assessment of adaptability of recently released salt tolerant rice varieties in coastal regions of South Bangladesh. Field Crops Res. 2016;1:190:34-43.

Balakrishnan D, Subrahmanyam D, Badri J, Raju AK, Rao YV, Beerelli K, Mesapogu S, Surapaneni M, Ponnuswamy R, Padmavathi G, Babu VR. Genotype× environment interactions of yield traits in backcross introgression lines derived from Oryza sativa cv. Swarna/Oryza nivara. Front. plant sci. 2016;19:7:1530.

Finlay KW & Wilkinson GN. The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1963; 14(6):742-54.

Eberhart ST & Russell WA. Stability parameters for comparing varieties 1. Crop sci. 1966;6(1):36-40.

Perkins J & Jinks. Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. VI. Diallel sets of crosses. Heredity. 1968;25:29-40.

Freeman GH & Perkins JM. Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability VIII. Relations between genotypes grown in different environments and measures of these environments. Heredity. 1971;27(1):15-23.

Shukla GK. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype environmental components of variability. Heredity. 1972; 29(2):237-45.

Kang MS. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability and yield-statistic. J. Agron. 1993;85(3):754-7.

Kempton RA. Adjustment for competition between varieties in plant breeding trials. The J. Agril. Sci. 1984;98(3):599-611.

Crossa J, Cornelius PL. Sites regression and shifted multiplicative model clustering of cultivar trial sites under heterogeneity of error variances. Crop Sci. 1997;37(2): 406-15.

Gauch Jr HG & Zobel RW. Identifying mega‐environments and targeting genotypes. Crop sci. 1997;37(2):311-26.

Gauch Jr HG. Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics. 1988;1:705-15.

Yan W, Hunt LA, Sheng Q, Szlavnics Z. Cultivar evaluation and mega‐environment investigation based on the GGE biplot. Crop Sci. 2000;40(3):597-605.

Padmashree R, Barbadikar KM, Magar ND, Balakrishnan D, Channappa G, Siddaiah AM, Madhav MS, Bharamappanavara M, Phule AS, Diwan J, Sundaram RM. Genome-wide association studies in rice germplasm reveal significant genomic regions for root and yield-related traits under aerobic and irrigated conditions. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14:1588.

Purchase JL, Hatting H, Van Deventer CS. Genotype× environment interaction of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil. 2000;1:17(3):101-7.

Babu PM, Neeraja CN, Rathod S, Suman K, Uttam GA, Chakravartty N, Lachagari VR, Chaitanya U, Rao LV, Voleti SR. Stable SNP allele associations with high grain zinc content in polished rice (Oryza sativa L.) identified based on ddRAD sequencing. Front. Genet. 2020;11: 11:763.

Sharifi P, Aminpanah H, Erfani R, Mohaddesi A, Abbasian A. Evaluation of genotype× environment interaction in rice based on AMMI model in Iran. Rice sci. 2017 May 1;24(3):173-80.

Ashwini GL, Rajanna MP, Deepak CA, Chethana BS, Shobha D, Gouda TH, Dushyanthkumar BM, Hanamaratti NG, Ramesh S, Nagaraj MS, Mahantashivayogayya KH. Stability analysis for grain yield and quality traits in selected traditional and improved varieties of rice over different Zones of Karnataka. Oryza. 2019;56(2):193-203.

Dewi AK, Chozin MA, Triwidodo H, Aswidinnoor H. Genotype× environment interaction, and stability analysis in lowland rice promising genotypes. Int. J. Agron. Agril. Res. 2014;5(5):74-84.

Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Magaji U, Miah G, Hussin G, Ramli A. Genotype× Environment interaction and stability analyses of yield and yield components of established and mutant rice genotypes tested in multiple locations in Malaysia. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B—Soil & Plant Sci. 2017;3:67(7):590-606.

Khan MM, Rafii MY, Ramlee SI, Jusoh M, Al Mamun M. AMMI and GGE biplot analysis for yield performance and stability assessment of selected Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc.) genotypes under the multi-environmental trials (METs). Sci. Rep. 2021;23: 11(1):22791.

Mwiinga B, Sibiya J, Kondwakwenda A, Musvosvi C, Chigeza G. Genotype x environment interaction analysis of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) grain yield across production environments in Southern Africa. Field crops Res. 2020;1: 256:107922.

Shrestha S, Asch F, Dusserre J, Ramanantsoanirina A, Brueck H. Climate effects on yield components as affected by genotypic responses to variable environmental conditions in upland rice systems at different altitudes. Field Crops Res. 2020;12: 134:216-28.

Shojaei SH, Mostafavi K, Omrani A, Omrani S, Nasir Mousavi SM, Illes A, Bojtor C, Nagy J. Yield stability analysis of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids using parametric and AMMI methods. Scientifica. 2021;25:1-9.