Assessing Grain Yield and Achieving Enhanced Quality in Maize by Next Generation Fertilizer: A Review

Dhruvendra Singh Sachan *

Department of Agronomy, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, India.

K. Jaisimha Reddy

Department of Agronomy, Agricultural College, Mahanandi, ANGRAU, Guntur, India and Department of Agronomy, Agriculture College Garhwa, Birsa Agricultural University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 834006, India.

Sulochna

Department of Agronomy, Agriculture University, Kota, India.

Yonika Saini

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Ghazipur, Directorate of Extension, Aacharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya, UP, India.

Avinash Kumar Rai

Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel University of Agriculture and Technology, Meerut, U.P., 250110, India.

Omkar Singh

Agricultural Polytechnic, Basanthpur, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

Thejavath Laxman

Agricultural Polytechnic, Basanthpur, Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

It explores the potential of advanced fertilizers in improving maize yield and quality while addressing environmental and socioeconomic concerns. Investigating the innovations in fertilizer technologies and their impact on maize cultivation, identifying research gaps and suggesting policy recommendations. The potential of advanced fertilizers for enhancing maize yield and quality while tackling environmental and socioeconomic issues: Advanced fertilizers, marked by enhanced nutrient use efficiency and targeted nutrient delivery, present valuable prospects for sustainable corn farming. This includes progress in fertilizer technologies, combined management strategies, and the effects of these cutting-edge products on corn yield and quality. Additionally, we explore research gaps, areas requiring further study, and policy suggestions to support the adoption of advanced fertilizers in corn production systems. By seizing these opportunities and addressing the related challenges, the global agricultural community can strive for more sustainable, efficient, and productive corn farming practices that contribute to improved food security and nutrition.

Keywords: Next-generation fertilizers, maize production, grain yield, grain quality, sustainable agriculture


How to Cite

Sachan , D. S., Reddy , K. J., Sulochna, Saini , Y., Rai , A. K., Singh , O., & Laxman , T. (2023). Assessing Grain Yield and Achieving Enhanced Quality in Maize by Next Generation Fertilizer: A Review. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(8), 626–637. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i81991

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shiferaw B, Prasanna BM, Hellin J, Bänziger M. Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Security. 2011;3(3):307-327.

FAO. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2021.

Available: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC

Bai C, Ge Y, Ashton R. W, Evans J, Milne A, Hawkesford MJ, Zhang F. The relationships between seedling root screens root growth in the field and grain yield for wheat. Annals of Botany. 2016;118(4):827-837.

Ray DK, Mueller ND, West PC, Foley JA. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(6):e66428.

Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort BL. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(50):20260-20264.

Krivanek AF, De Groote H, Gunaratna NS. Breeding and disseminating quality protein maize (QPM) for Africa. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2007;6(4):312-324.

Lobell DB, Schlenker W, Costa-Roberts J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science. 2011;333(6042):616-620.

Van der Velde M, Tubiello FN, Vrieling A, Bouraoui F. Impacts of extreme weather on wheat and maize in France: evaluating regional crop simulations against observed data. Climatic Change. 2012;113(3-4):751-765.

Cameron KC, Di HJ, Moir JL. Nitrogen losses from the soil/plant system: a review. Annals of Applied Biology. 2013;162(2):145-173.

Zhang W, Ma W, Ji Y, Fan M, Oenema O, Zhang F. Fertilizer nitrogen uptake by maize and soil nitrate dynamics in a long-term field experiment in northern China. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems. 2019;113(2):187-199.

Li X, Li Z, Zhang W, Li X, Xing Y. Effects of controlled-release urea on yield nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen balance in paddy fields of southern China. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2016;39(1):106-116.

Wang Y, Li Y, Ye X, Chu Q, Zhou S. Advances in the technologies and practices of nitrogen management for the environmental safety and high productivity of cropland: A review. Science of the Total Environment. 2018;645:1504-1515.

Chen L, Liu M, Qin S. Effects of coated urea on maize (Zea mays L.) yield nitrogen use efficiency and soil nitrate accumulation in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2016;15(7):1513-1522.

Giro VB, Ferraz PFP, Crusciol CAC, Castro GSA. Corn yield response to winter cover crops and nitrogen fertilization in a long-term no-till system. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira. 2016;51(12): 2020-2027.

Shaviv A, Mikkelsen RL. Controlled-release fertilizers to increase efficiency of nutrient use and minimize environmental degradation—A review. Fertilizer Research. 1993;35(1):1-12.

Zhang X, Wang Z, Zhang R, Saleem M. Next-generation fertilizers: The key to improving global food security and environmental sustainability? Environmental Science & Technology. 2019;53(14):7927-7930.

FAO. FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2020.

Singh V, Kumar A, Sharma A, Singh R. Assessing grain yield and achieving enhanced quality in maize by next generation fertilizer - A review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;245:118855.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118855

Basso B, Cammarano D, Carfagna E. Review of crop yield forecasting methods and early warning systems. Proceedings of the first meeting of the scientific advisory committee of the global strategy to improve agricultural and rural statistics FAO Headquarters Rome Italy; 2013.

Mulla DJ. Twenty-five years of remote sensing in precision agriculture: Key advances and remaining knowledge gaps. Biosystems Engineering. 2013;114(4):358-371.

Zhang C, Kovacs JM. The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review. Precision Agriculture. 2012;13(6):693-712.

Bramley RGV, Ouzman J. Precision agriculture in Australasia: a review. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 2019;157(1):1-18.

Sui R, Thomasson JA. Ground-based sensing system for weed mapping in cotton. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2014;100:99-106.

Khaki S, Wang L. Machine learning approaches to improve crop yield prediction: A review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 2019;167:104966.

Zhang W, Li X, Ye X, Li Z, Li Z. A data-driven approach for predicting maize yield response to controlled-release urea and polymer-coated urea in China. Agricultural Systems. 2017;157:95-104.

Bänziger M, Diallo AO. Quality protein maize: overcoming the hurdles. Journal of Crop Production. 2001;3(1):193-227.

Xu Y, Crouch JH. Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Science. 2008;48(2):391-407.

Cárcova J, Otegui ME. Ear temperature and pollination timing effects on maize kernel set. Crop Science. 2001;41(6):1809-1815.

Campos H, Cooper M, Habben JE, Edmeades GO, Schussler JR. Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry. Field Crops Research. 2004;90(1):19-34.

Miao Y, Stewart BA, Zhang F. Long-term experiments for sustainable nutrient management in China. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2011;31(2):397-414.

Sadras VO, Grassini P, Steduto P, Tellería MC. Maize yield gaps in subtropical South America: Magnitude causes and simulation of management strategies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2013;178:124-135.

Subbarao GV, Ito O, Sahrawat KL, Berry WL, Nakahara K, Ishikawa T, Rao IM. Scope and strategies for regulation of nitrification in agricultural systems—challenges and opportunities. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2006;25(4):303-335.

Erisman JW, Sutton MA, Galloway J, Klimont Z, Winiwarter W. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nature Geoscience. 2008;1(10):636- 639.

Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH. Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecological Applications. 1998;8(3):559-568.

Akiyama H, Yan X, Yagi K. Evaluation of the effectiveness of mitigation measures for reducing global warming potential of rice production. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 2010;135(1-2):68-75.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press; 2014.

Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, Scholes B. Agriculture. In B. Metz O. R. Davidson P. R. Bosch R. Dave & L. A. Meyer (Eds.): Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. 2007;497-540.

IFA (International Fertilizer Industry Association). The Global “4R” Nutrient Stewardship Framework: Developing Fertilizer Best Management Practices. Paris France: IFA; 2009.

Liu R, Lal R. Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of the Total Environment. 2015;514:131- 139.

Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microbial Ecology. 2009;58(4):921- 929.

Rosenstock TS, Diaz-Pines E, Zuazo P, Jordan G, Predotova M, Mutuo P, Butterbach-Bahl K. Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed. Global Change Biology. 2014;20(2):348-355.

Lobell DB, Roberts MJ, Schlenker W, Braun N, Little BB, Rejesus RM, Hammer GL. Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the US Midwest. Science. 2014;344(6183): 516-519.