Elucidating Late Leaf Spot Disease Progression and Resistance Components in Different Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars towards Phaeoisariopsis personata

Sompalli Suresh Rao *

Department of Plant Pathology, S. V. Agricultural College, Tirupati, India.

R. Sarada Jayalakshmi

DAATTC and University Head, Plant Pathology, ANGRAU, India.

Hari Kishan Sudini

Groundnut Pathology, ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India.

K. Vemana

Plant Pathology, Agricultural Research Station, Kadiri, India.

A. Srividhya

Genetics and Plant Breeding, IFT, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Tirupati, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Late Leaf Spot (LLS) disease is caused by Phaeoisariopsis personata, a devastating disease that significantly affects groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) production worldwide. This research aimed to investigate the disease progress in resistant and susceptible groundnut genotypes under green house conditions with artificial inoculations. The four popularly growing groundnut cultivars in Andhra Pradesh i.e., Kadiri-6 (K6), Dharani, Harithandra and Lepakshi (K-1812) were evaluated in this study. The disease severity scale, percent disease index (PDI), Area under disease progression curve (AUDPC) and the epidemic rate (rate) were estimated by using the linear model. Highest disease severity was observed in K6 (88.19 %) and Dharani (85.19 %) with greater disease progression rate was observed in K6 (0.13) and Dharani (0.12) cultivars. However, the lowest disease progression was observed in Lepakshi (0.04) and Harithandhra (0.08) cultivars. Enhanced resistance to LLS was reported with Harithandhra and Lepakshi cultivars due to slower epidemic rate, longer incubation and latent periods with smaller lesions.

Keywords: Late leaf spot, groundnut, epidemiology, disease progression, AUDPC, epidemic rate (r)


How to Cite

Rao , S. S., Jayalakshmi , R. S., Sudini , H. K., Vemana , K., & Srividhya , A. (2023). Elucidating Late Leaf Spot Disease Progression and Resistance Components in Different Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Cultivars towards Phaeoisariopsis personata. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(10), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102671

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Shokes FM, Culbreath AK. Early and late leaf spots. In N. Kokalis-Burelle, D.M. Porter, R. RodriguezKabana, D.H. Smith, and P. Subrahmanyam (eds.). Compendium of Peanut Diseases, 2nd Ed. APS Press. 1997;17-20.

Shew BB, Sommartya T, Beute MK. Components of partial resistance in peanut genotypes to isolates of Cercosporidium personatum from the United States and Thailand. Phytopathology. 1989;79:136-142.

Waliyar F, Shew BB, Sidahmed R, Beute MK. Effects of host resistance on germination of Cercospora arachidicola on peanut leaf surfaces. Peanut Science. 1995;22:154-157.

Chiyembekeza AJ, Knauft DA, Gorbet DW. Comparison of components of resistance in peanut to late leaf spot in different environments. Crop Science. 1993;33: 994-997.

Walls SB, Wynne JC, Beute MK. Resistance to late leaf spot of peanut of progenies selected for resistance to early leaf spot. Peanut Science. 1985;12:22-27.

Tshilenge-Lukanda, Nkongolo KKC, Kalonji-Mbuyi A, Kizungu RV. Epidemiology of the groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) leaf spot disease: Genetic Analysis and developmental cycles. American Journal of Plant Sciences. 2012; 3(5):582-588.

Subrahmanyam P, McDonald D, Gibbons RW, Nigam SN, Nevill DL. Resistance to rust and late leaf spot diseases in some genotypes of arachis hypogaea. Peanut Science. 1982;9(1):6-10.

Pande S, Rao JN, Sharma M. Factors contributing to variability in host resistance to late leaf spot and rust diseases of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). European Journal of Plant Pathology. 2006;114(1):77-85.

Reddy PM, McDonald D. Factors contributing to late leaf spot epidemics in groundnut during the post-rainy season in Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Phytopathology. 2001;149(1):27-34.

Shanmugasundaram S, Palaniswami MS. Epidemiology of groundnut rust and late leaf spot in relation to environment. Tropical Agricultural Research. 1996; 8:301-310.

Woodroof JG. Leaf spots of peanut. Journal of Agricultural Research. 1933;46(2):139-163.

Jenkins AE. Diseases of cultivated plants and trees in India. Pioneers; 1938.

Mehrotra RS, Agarwal HP. A textbook of plant pathology. Tata McGraw-Hill Education; 2003.

Gaur PM, Pande S, Sharma HC, Rao BV, Rao JN. Inheritance of resistance to late leaf spot and rust in groundnut. Annals of Applied Biology. 1998;133(3):429-437.

Nigam SN, McDonald D. Breeding for resistance to rust and late leaf spot in groundnut. Groundnut rust and late leaf spot: Proceedings of the Workshop, 14-15 Oct 1996, ICRISAT Asia Center, Patancheru, India. 1996;52-61.

Wilcoxson RD, Skovamand B, Atif AH. Evaluation of wheat cultivars for ability to retard development of stem rust. Annuals of Applied Biology. 1975;80: 275-281.

Sharma M, Ghosh R, Telangre R, Pande S, Rao MS. Studies on inheritance of resistance to foliar diseases in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Field Crops Research. 2012;134:184-189.

Sharma M, Pande S, Rao JN. Effect of temperature and leaf wetness duration on infection of groundnut by conidia of Mycosphaerella berkeleyi, the causal agent of late leaf spot. Annals of Applied Biology. 2003;142(2): 177-183.

Subrahmanyam P, McDonald D. A critical analysis of the techniques for screening groundnut for resistance to rust and late leaf spot. Peanut Science. 1984;11(2): 74-78.

Cantonwine EG, Culbreath AK, Holbrook CC, Gorbet DW. Disease progress of early leaf spot and components of resistance to cercospora arachidicola and cercosporidium personatum in runner-type peanut cultivars. Peanut Science. 2008; 35(1):1-10.

Janila P, Nigam SN, Abhishek R, Anil Kumar V, Manohar SS, Venuprasad R, Varshney RK. Groundnut improvement: Use of genetic and genomic tools. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2018;9:998.

Aquino VM, Shokes FM, Gorbet DW, Nutter Jr FW. Late leaf spot progression on peanut as affected by components of partial resistance. Plant Disease. 1995; 79:74-78.