Effect of Nano Phosphorus on Growth and Yield of Groundnut Varieties (Arachis hypogaea L.) and Yield Prediction over SPSS Model

Guguloth Shiva Kumar *

Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Biswarup Mehera

Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Prateek Kumar

Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Gandla Suresh Kumar

Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, SHUATS, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The experiment was conducted during the Summer season 2022, at the Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Science, Prayagraj (U.P.) to find out the “Effect of Nano phosphorus on growth and yield of different varieties of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and Yield validation using SPSS model”. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design comprising of 9 treatments which include 3 varieties Kadiri Lepakshi (K1812), Kadiri 6 (K6) and Kadiri 9 (K9) and 3 Different levels of nano phosphorous 2ml/litre, 4ml/litre and 6m/litre. Whose effect is observed in Ground nut varieties The result was observed in K-1812 by the application of nano phosphorus at the rate of 6 ml/lit was recorded maximum plant height (61.39 cm), plant dry weight (42.34 g/plant), number of pods per plant (32.87), seed index (42.09 g), pod yield (2.98 t/ha) and haulm yield (4.46 t/ha) and harvest index (40.07 %) were recorded in K-1812 with application of Nano phosphorus at the rate of 6 ml/lit respectively. At the same time higher gross return (1,25,307.00 INR/ha), net return (88,467.35 INR/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.40).Treatment 3 has shown 42.28% increase over predicted yield where as there were 10.88% increase in treatment 7 over predicted yield through SPSS model.

Keywords: Groundnut, yield, varieties, nano phosphorus, yield validation and SPSS


How to Cite

Kumar , G. S., Mehera , B., Kumar , P., & Kumar , G. S. (2023). Effect of Nano Phosphorus on Growth and Yield of Groundnut Varieties (Arachis hypogaea L.) and Yield Prediction over SPSS Model. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(10), 590–595. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102690

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Priya NS, Dawson J, Reddy N. Effect of biofertilizers and gypsum levels on growth and yield of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea). The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2022; 11(5):708-713.

Nurezannat Sarkar AR, Uddin R, Sarker UK, Kaysar S, Saha PK. Effect of variety and sulphur on yield and yield components of groundnut. Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University. 2009;17(1):1-8.

Satish I, Shrivastava SK. Nutritional study of new variety of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). African Journal of Food Science. 2011;5(8):490-498.

FAOSTAT; 2020.

Zheng LF, Hong S, Lu, Liu C. Effect of nano-TiO2on strength of nat urally aged seeds and growth of spinach. Biological Trace Elements Research. 2005;104:83-91.

Gitan JN, Mureith JG. Effect of phosphorus fertilizat ion on legume nodule format ion and biomass production in Mount Kenya Region. East African Agriculture Journal. 2003;69:183-187.

Kurepa J, Paunesku T, Vogt S. Uptake and distribution of ultrasmall anat ase TiO2 Alizarin red Snanoconjugates in Arabidopsis thaliana, Nano Letters. 2010; 10(7):2296–2302.

Alcantar-Gonzalez G, Trejo-Téllez LI, Gómez-Merino FC. Nutrición de Cultivos, Editorial del Colegio de Postgraduados Segunda Edición; 2016.

Shen J, Yuan L, Zhang J. Phosphorus dynamics: from soil to plant. Plant Physiology. 2011;156(3):997–1005.

Almeida DS, Penn CJ, Rosolem CA. Assessment of phosphorus availability in soil cultivat ed with ruzigrass, Geoderma. 2018;312:64–73.

Jain RC, Sridharan H, Agarwal R. Principal component technique for forecasting of sorghum yield. Indian Jornal of Agricultural Sciences. 1984;54(6):467-70.

Ramasubramanian V, Jain RC. Use of growth indices in Markov Chain model for crop yield forecasting. Biometrical Journal. 1994;41(1):99-109.

Walker GK. Model for operational forecasting of western Canada wheat yield. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 1989;44(3-4):339-351.

Appa Rao GJ. Estimation of wheat yields over Punjab using district and state models. Mausam. 1983;34(3):275-80.

Liu R, Lal R. Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max). Scientific Reports. 2014;4:56-86.

De Rosaet MR, Monreal C, Schnitzer M, Walsh, R, Sultan Y. Nanotechnology in fertilizers. National Nanotechnology Journal. 2010;5:91-96.

Brady NC. The nature and properties of soils. Macmillan Publication Co., New York and Collier Macmillan Publisher, London; 1983.

Naphade PC, Waphade KJ. Root CEC and P fertilization in sunflower. Annals of Plant Physiology. 1991;5(2):247-252.