Species Diversity, Phytosociological Attributes and Regeneration Status of Pench Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra, India

Ravivarma Dudipala

Forest College and Research Institute, Mulugu, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Chandramohan Kolagani *

Forest Survey of India, Central Zone, Nagpur, Maharashtra 440006, India.

Sree Lakshmi A.

Pench Tiger Reserve, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Prabhunath Shukla

Pench Tiger Reserve, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Sahith Chepyala

Forest College and Research Institute, Mulugu, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Varun Podishetti

Forest College and Research Institute, Mulugu, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Swamynath Shakati

Forest College and Research Institute, Mulugu, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Nikhil Basai

Forest College and Research Institute, Mulugu, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

CH. Bhargavi

Forest College and Research Institute, Mulugu, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Aims: Pench Tiger Reserve (PTR) is known for its rich biodiversity comprising of tropical deciduous forests as their primary forest type. Tropical deciduous forests are enriched with economically important species. They serve as habitat areas for most of the wild animals for their food and shelter. So, a phytosociological investigation was carried out in PTR to know the information on plant cover dynamics related to human activity, climate change, and all other factors affecting plant development.

Place and Duration of Study: Pench Tiger Reserve (PTR), June 2021 to December 2022.

Methodology: The study was carried out by laying out 47 sample plots in the PTR by dividing Tiger Reserve into 7 ranges. The plot size was 0.1 ha with 31.62 m x 31.62 m quadrats. Varied diversity indices such as Simpson, Shannon–Weiner, species evenness, and IVI were calculated according to standard formulae. Carbon stock, vegetation analysis and IVI value of each species were calculated and analysed.

Results: A total of 102 species, comprising 90 genera and 44 families, were reported. The dominant family in the study area was Leguminosae, followed by Malvaceae and Poaceae. The Shannon–Weiner index was 2.92 and the Simpson index was 0.103, indicating moderate diversity with less dominance of trees, saplings, and herb layer in the area. Top five species holding highest IVI value are Tectona grandis (66.20), Lagerstroemia parviflora (20.44), Chloroxylon swietenia (19.91), Lannea coromandelica (18.35), and Terminalia tomentosa (16.62).

Conclusions: As a part of long–term monitoring programme for the tree communities in the Pench Tiger Reserve, the current study has generated baseline data that will be used to evaluate the current ecological effects of ongoing and future climate change.           

Keywords: IVI, Maharashtra, Pench Tiger Reserve, phytosociology, Shannon-Weiner index and Simpson index

How to Cite

Dudipala , R., Kolagani , C., A. , S. L., Shukla , P., Chepyala , S., Podishetti , V., Shakati , S., Basai , N., & Bhargavi , C. (2023). Species Diversity, Phytosociological Attributes and Regeneration Status of Pench Tiger Reserve, Maharashtra, India. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(10), 1743–1757. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i102831


Download data is not yet available.


Kumar R, Raina AK. Phytosociology and species diversity in the catchment of Ratle hydro-electric project, District Kishtwar–J&K (India). Environment Conservation Journal. 2012;13(3):141-145.

Niirou N, Gupta A. Phytosociological analysis and carbon stocks for trees in different land uses in Senapati district of Manipur, India. Pleione. 2017;11(1):64- 70.

Hart TB. Monospecific dominance in tropical rain forests. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 1990;5(1):6-11.

Gentry AH. Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests. In Cambridge University Press eBooks. 1995; 146–194.

Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Da Fonseca GA, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403(6772):853-858.

Baraloto C, Molto Q, Rabaud S, Hérault B, Valencia R, Blanc L, et al. Rapid simultaneous estimation of above ground biomass and tree diversity across Neotropical forests: A comparison of field inventory methods. Biotropica. 2013;45(3): 288-298.

Kumar M, Bhatt VP, Rajwar GS. Plant and soil diversities in a sub-tropical forest of the Garhwal Himalaya. Ghana Journal of Forestry. 2006;19:1-19.

Gandhi DS, Sundarapandian S. Inventory of trees in tropical dry deciduous forests of Tiruvannamalai district, Tamil Nadu, India. Biodiversitas. 2014;15:169-179.

Tamilselvan B, Sekar T, Anbarashan M. Tree diversity, stand structure and community composition of tropical forest in Eastern Ghats of Tamil Nadu, India. The Indian Forester. 2021;147(5):481-489.

Dixit AM. Ecological evaluation of dry tropical forest vegetation: An approach to environmental impact assessment. Tropical Ecology. 1997;38(1):87-99.

Fahey TJ, Woodbury PB, Battles JJ, Goodale CL, Hamburg SP, Ollinger SV, Woodall CW. Forest carbon storage: Ecology, management, and policy. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2010;8(5):245-252.

Kushwaha SPS, Nandy S, Gupta M. Growing stock and woody biomass assessment in Asola-Bhatti Wildlife Sanctuary, Delhi, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2014;186: 5911-5920.

Salunkhe Onkar, Khare PK, Singh Sarnam. Above Ground Biomass and carbon stocking in tropical deciduous forests of State of Madhya Pradesh, India. Taiwania. 2014;59:353-359.

Jhariya MK. Vegetation ecology and carbon sequestration potential of shrubs in tropics of Chhattisgarh, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2017;189:1-15.

Banik B, Deb D, Deb S, Datta BK. Assessment of biomass and carbon stock in sal (Shorea robusta Gaertn.) forests under two management regimes in Tripura, Northeast India. Journal of Forest and Environmental Science. 2018;34(3):209-223.

Padmakumar B, Sreekanth NP, Shanthiprabha V, Paul J, Sreedharan K, Augustine T, et al. Tree biomass and carbon density estimation in the tropical dry forest of Southern Western Ghats, India. iForest-Biogeosciences and Forestry. 2018 ;11(4):534.

ISFR. India State of Forest Report 2021. Forest Survey of India. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of India, DehraDun, India; 2021.

Gibbs HK, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA. Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: Making REDD a reality. Environmental Research Letters. 2007;2(4):045023.

Brown SL, Schroeder P, Kern JS. Spatial distribution of biomass in forests of the eastern USA. Forest Ecology and Management. 1999;123(1):81-90.

Mani S, Parthasarathy N. Above-ground biomass estimation in ten tropical dry evergreen forest sites of peninsular India. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2007;31(5):284-290.

Terakunpisut J, Gajaseni N, Ruankawe N. Carbon sequestration potential in aboveground biomass of Thong PhaPhum national forest, Thailand. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research. 2007;5(2): 93-102.

Reddy CS, Jha CS, Diwakar PG, Dadhwal VK. Nationwide classification of forest types of India using remote sensing and GIS. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2015;187:1-30.

Odum EP. Fundamentals of ecology. Philadelphia - London-Toronto. 1971;740.

Sarma P, Das D. Application of Shannon’s index to study diversity with reference to census data of Assam. Asian Journal of Management Research. 2004;5(4):620-628.

Margalef R. Information theory in ecology. Gen. Sys. 1958;3:36-71.

Curtis JT, Mcintosh RP. The interrelations of certain analytic and synthetic Phytosociological characters. Ecology. 1950;31(3):434-455.

Pressler MR. Aus der holzzuwachlehre (zweiterartikel). Allgemeine Forst-und Jagdzeitung. 1860;36:173-191.

Bitterlich, W. (1984). The relascope idea. Relative measurements in forestry. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.

IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. [(H.S. Engleston, L. Bundia, K. Miwa, T. Nagra and K. Tanabe, (eds.)] IPCC-IGES, Japan; 2006.

Hossen S, Hossain MK, Hossain MA, Uddin MF. Quantitative assessment of tree species diversity of Himchari National Park (HNP) in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Asian Journal of Forestry. 2021;5(1):1-7.

Devi Khumbongmayum A, Khan ML, Tripathi RS. Sacred groves of Manipur, northeast India: biodiversity value, status and strategies for their conservation. Biodiversity & Conservation. 2005;14: 1541-1582.

Sharma CM, Mishra AK, Prakash O, Dimri S, Baluni P. Assessment of forest structure and woody plant regeneration on ridge tops at upper Bhagirathi basin in Garhwal Himalaya. Tropical Plant Research. 2014;1(3):62-71.

Grubb PJ. Mineral nutrition and soil fertility in tropical rain forests. In Tropical forests: management and ecology. New York, NY: Springer New York. 1995;308-330.

Ahmed GU, Haque SMS. Percentage distribution of species and diameter class in a natural forest of Bangladesh. Chittagong University Studies Part II: Science (Bangladesh). 1993;17(1):109-113.

Malaker JC, Rahman MM, Prodhan AKMA, Malaker SK, Khan MAH. Floristic composition of Madhupur Sal forest in Bangladesh. J. Soil Nature. 2010;4(1):25-33.

Nath TK, Hossain MK, Alam MK. Diversity and composition of trees in Sitapahar forest reserve of Chittagong Hill Tracts (South) forest division, Bangladesh. Annals of Forestry. 1998;6(1):1-9.

Hossain MK, Hossain M, Alam MK. Diversity and structural composition of trees in Bamu reserved forest of Cox’s Bazar Forest division, Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Forest Science. 1997;26:31–42.

Sudhakar Reddy C, Babar S, Amarnath G, Pattanaik C. Structure and floristic composition of tree stand in tropical forest in the Eastern Ghats of northern Andhra Pradesh, India. Journal of Forestry Research. 2011;22(4):491-500.

Motaleb MA, Hossain MK. Assessment of tree species diversity of Tankawati natural forests, Chittagong (South) Forest Division, Bangladesh. Eco-Friendly Agric J. 2011;4(2):542-545.

Hossain MK, Rahman ML, Hoque AR, Alam MK. Comparative regeneration status in a natural forest and enrichment plantations of Chittagong (south) forest division, Bangladesh. Journal of Forestry Research. 2004;15:255-260.

Majumdar K, Choudhary BK, Datta BK. Aboveground woody biomass, carbon stocks potential in selected tropical forest patches of Tripura, Northeast India. Open Journal of Ecology. 2016;6(10):598-612.

Salunkhe O, Khare PK, Sahu TR, Singh S. Estimation of tree biomass reserves in tropical deciduous forests of Central India by non-destructive approach. Tropical Ecology. 2016;57(2):153-161.

Vikram S, Gupta SR, Narender S. Carbon sequestration potential of tropical dry deciduous forests in southern Haryana, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2016;42(5):51-64.

Murthy IK, Bhat S, Sathyanarayan V, Patgar S, Beerappa M, Bhat PR, et al. Biomass and carbon stock dynamics in tropical evergreen and deciduous forests of Uttara Kannada District, Western Ghats, India. Glob J Sci Front Res H Environ Earth Sci. 2015;15(5):21-29.

Saner P, Loh YY, Ong RC, Hector A. Carbon stocks and fluxes in tropical lowland dipterocarp rainforests in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. PloS One. 2012; 7(1):e29642.

Raha D, Dar JA, Pandey PK, Lone PA, Verma S, Khare PK, Khan ML. Variation in tree biomass and carbon stocks in three tropical dry deciduous forest types of Madhya Pradesh, India. Carbon Management. 2020;11(2):109-120.

Balasubramanian P, Bole PV. Seed dispersal by mammals at Point Calimere Wildlife Santuary, Tamil Nadu. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society. 1993;90(1):33-44.

Murali KS, Sukumar R. Reproductive phenology of a tropical dry forest in Mudumalai, southern India. Journal of Ecology. 1994;82:759-767.