Evaluation of Silage Quality of Forage Maize (Zea mays L.) and Sweet Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Varieties at Different Phenophases
E. Pooja Sree *
College of Agriculture, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad–030, Telangana, India.
R. V. T. Balazzii Naaiik
AICRP on Forage Crops and Utilization, Agricultural Research Institute, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad–030, Telangana, India.
K. Bhanu Rekha
College of Agriculture, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad–030, Telangana, India.
T. Sukruth Kumar
AICRP on Forage Crops and Utilization, Agricultural Research Institute, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad–030, Telangana, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the green fodder production potential of forage maize and sweet sorghum varieties at different phenophases.
Experiment Design: Factorial Randomized Block Design (FRBD).
Place and Duration of Study: AICRP on Forage Crops and Utilization, Agricultural Research Institute. Duration from July 2022 to Nov 2022.
Methodology: Field experiment was conducted at AICRP on Forage Crops and Utilization, Agricultural Research Institute (ARI), Rajendranagar, Hyderabad during kharif 2022. The treatments consisted of four maize varieties (African tall, J –1006, TSFM 15-5 and DHM-117) and two sweet sorghum varieties (CSH-22SS and CSV-49SS) and three harvest stages (S1: Milky stage, S2: Soft dough stage and S3: Dent stage) laid out in randomized block design with factorial concept with two factors. Factor (A) as six varieties and factor (B) as three harvest stages (phenophases) with three replications. Texture of the soil was sandy loam with the pH of 7.0, low in available nitrogen (199.3 kg ha-1), medium in available phosphorous (39.12 kg ha-1) and potassium (195.30 kg ha-1).
Results: Fodder maize variety African tall recorded significantly higher plant height (265.8 cm) at dent stage, leaf-stem ratio (0.36) at milky stage, green fodder yield (438 q ha-1) at soft dough stage and dry fodder yield (122.7 q ha-1) at dent stage of harvest. while J-1006 recorded significantly highest dry matter content (29.8%) at the dent stage of harvest. CSH 22SS recorded significantly higher crude protein content (10%) in the milky stage.
Conclusion: African tall variety has recorded significantly higher green fodder yield (438 q ha-1) at soft dough stage and dry fodder yield at the dent stage (122.7 q ha-1).
Keywords: Forage maize, fodder yield, factorial randomized block design, green fodder
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Ahmed S, Malaviya AB, Majumdar AB. Genetic divergence and variability in fodder maize. Forage Research. 2010;35:223-226.
Gour V, Patel PC, Patel MR, Patel NN. Effect of sowing date and harvesting stage on forage yield and quality of maize. Forage Research. 2006;31:267-268.
Mahdi SS, Hasan B, Bhat RA, Aziz MA. Yield and economics of fodder maize as influenced by nitrogen and seed rate and zinc under temperate conditions. Forage Research. 2010;210(36):22-25.
Devi LG. Forage yield of maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced by nitrogen levels and biofertilizers. Forage Research. 2002;27: 263-266.
Takawale PS, Desale JS, Kauthale VK. Assessment of unexploited maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm and its utilization in heterosis for forage traits. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant breeding. 2009;69:159-161.
Mullet J, Morishige D, McCormick R, Truong S, Hilley J, McKinley B, Anderson R, Olson SN, Rooney W.. Energy Sorghum - a genetic model for the design of C4 grass bioenergy crops. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2014;65(13):3479-3489.
Bakari H, Djomdi, Ruben ZF, Roger DD, Cedric D, Guillaume P, Pascal D, Philippe M, Gwendoline C. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) and Its Main Parts (By-Products) as Promising Sustainable Sources of Value-Added Ingredients. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2023;14(4):1023-44.
Lucena NT, Santos EM, Perazzo AF, de Oliveira JS, Macêdo AJ, Pereira DM, Cruz GF, Pereira GA, Ramos RC, Nogueira MD. Agronomic features and evaluation of forage sorghum silage as a function of nitrogen fertilisation in humid and mesothermal climate. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 2023;4:66(2):113-27.
Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2 Ed.). John Wiley and Sons, New York.1984;680.
Ginwal Devendra Kumar, Ram Hardev, Dutta Susanta, Arjun Mallik, Hindoriya Phool. Fodder productivity and profitability of different maize and legume intercropping systems. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2019;89:1451-1455.
Rathod SD, Shinde GC, Shinde SD. Genetic variability and path coefficient analysis studies in forage maize genotypes (Zea mays L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2021;10(1):2764-2768.
Ayub MM, Nadeem A, Tanveer A, Husnain A. Effect of and quality of sorghum fodder different levels of nitrogen and harvesting times on the growth, yield. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 2002;1:304-07.
Ayub M, Nadeem MA, Tahir M, Ibrahim M, Aslam MN. Effect of nitrogen application and harvesting intervals on forage yield and quality of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.). Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 2009;10(2):185-89.
Filho AXS, Pinho RGV, Pereira JLAR, Reis MC, Rezende AV, Mata DC. Influence of stage of maturity on bromatological quality of corn forage. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia. 2011;40(9): 1894-1901.
Chattha MU, Iqbal A, Hassan MU, Chattha MB, Ishaque W, Usman M, Khan S, Fayyaz MT, Ullah MA. Forage yield and quality of sweet sorghum as influenced by sowing methods and harvesting times. Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2017;13:301-306.
Amodu JT, Akpensuen TT, Dung DD, Tanko RJ, Musa A, Abubakar SA, Hassan MR, Jegede J,
Sani I. Evaluation of maize accessions for nutrients composition, forage and silage yields. Journal of Agricultural Science. 2014;6(4):178.
Horst EH, Bumbieris Junior VH, Neumann M, López S. Effects of the harvest stage of maize hybrids on the chemical composition of plant fractions: An analysis of the different types of silage. Agriculture. 2021; 11(8):786.
Irlbeck NA, Russell JR, Hallauer AR, Buxton DR. Nutritive value and ensiling characteristics of maize stover as influenced by hybrid maturity and generation, plant density and harvest date. Animal feed science and technology. 1993;41(1):51-64.
Singh D, Chauhan A, Chaudhary A. Evaluation of maize cultivars for forage yield, silage quality traits and nutrient uptake in agro-climatic conditions of central Gujarat, India. Range Management and Agroforestry. 2020;41(1): 133-140.