Stability Analysis for Seed Yield Trait in Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.)

Ajay Pal Yadav *

Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, India.

Gaibriyal M. Lal

Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Present study was undertaken to estimate the magnitude of genotype × environment interaction (GEI) and to identify stability of improved and high-yielding varieties of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czerns & coss.). The 57 Indian mustard genotypes were evaluated in RBD along with three replications during Rabi crop seasons in three environments. Analysis of variance on 14 traits was carried out individually as well as pooled over environments. Yield stability was analysed employing Eberhart and Russell’s model [1] which revealed highly significant differences among genotypes and environments. Mean squares due to environment + genotype x environment interactions (E + G x E) indicated that genotypes interacted considerably with environmental conditions. Further, partitioning of E+G x E effects indicated that E (linear), G x E (linear) components were highly significant for grain yield. Genotypes RH-749, DRMR 1165-40 X RH-406, DRMR IJ-31 X RH-749 had high mean than general mean coupled with regression coefficient close to unity bi = 1 and S2di = 0 and are identified as most stable and desirable Indian mustard genotypes.

Keywords: Stability, G X E interaction, stability Indian mustard genotypes


How to Cite

Yadav , A. P., & Lal , G. M. (2023). Stability Analysis for Seed Yield Trait in Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern & Coss.). International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(10), 3506–3513. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i103020

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Eberhart SS, Russell WA. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science. 1966;6:36–40.

Warwick SI, Francis A, La Fleche J. Guide to wild germplasm of Brassica and allied crops (tribe brassicaceae); 2000.

Available:http://res2.agr.ca/ecorc/staff/ warwick/warw- s1.htm

Chand S, Patidar OP, Chaudhary R, Saroj R, Chandra K, Meena VK, et al. Rapeseed-mustard breeding in India: Scenario, achievements and research needs. Brassica breeding and Biotechnology. 2021;174.

Srivastava A, Srivastava K. Stability analysis in Indian Mustard (Brassica junceal. czern & coss.) over normal and terminal heat stress environments. Plant Archives. 2020;20(1):3343- 3347.

Yadava DK, Giri SC, Vasudev S, Kumar Yadav A, Dass B, Raje RS, et al. Stability analysis in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) varieties. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2010;80(9):761.

Chaudhary SPS, Choudhary AK, Singh RV, Singh NP, Shrimali MK. Genotype × environment interaction for yield contributing characters in Indian mustard [Brassica juncea (L.) Czern & Coss]. Research on-Crops. 2004;5(2/3):232–239.

Dhillon SS, Brar KS, Singh K, Raheja RK. G×E interaction and stability of elite strains in Indian mustard. Crop Improvement. 2001;28(1):89–94.

Yadav OP, Razdan AK, Kumar B. Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis of grain yield in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2019;8(5):686-688.

Kamdi S, Ingole H, Bhure S, Meshram M, Tajane D, Patil P. Stability analysis in Indian mustard. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 2022;11(7):4351-4354.

Henry A, Daulay HS. Genotype × environment interaction for seed yield in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea subsp. juncea). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 1988;58:794–805.