Bio-management Options for Ecosystem Services, Carbon Sequestration and Climate Change Adaptation in Saline Environment

Main Article Content

Mukesh Kumar
S. R. Gupta
Neetu Kataria
G. T. Patle


Nearly one billion hectares of arid and semiarid areas of the world are salt affected and remain barren due to salinity or water scarcity. These lands can be utilized by adopting appropriate planting techniques and integrating trees with tolerant crops, forage grasses, oil yielding crops, aromatic and medicinal plants. Biosaline agroforestry provides various ecosystem services such as the improved soil fertility, carbon sequestration, and biomass production. Provisioning services relating to biomass production have been well studied in different biosaline agroforestry. Tree plantations and agroforestry enrich the soil in organic matter and exert a considerable ameliorative effect on soil properties. The soil microbial biomass serves as a useful indicator of soil improvement under salt stress. By integrating trees with the naturally occurring grassland systems on highly sodic soils, the soil organic carbon content increased from 5.3 Mg ha−1 (in sole grass) to 13.6, 10.9, and 14.2 Mg ha−1, when Dalbergia sissoo, Acacia nilotica, and Prosopis juliflora trees were introduced with grass. The strip-plantations of clonal Eucalyptus tereticornis sequestered 15.5 t ha–1 carbons during the first rotation of 5 years and 4 months. The soils of biosaline agroforestry could store 25.9–99.3 Mg C ha−1 in surface 0.3 m soil. Maintaining the stores and sink of carbon in agroforestry could play a key role in climate change mitigation as well as help in adaption changing environmental conditions.

Climate change, adaptation, carbon sequestration, ecosystem services, salinity, tree planation.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kumar, M., Gupta, S. R., Kataria, N., & Patle, G. T. (2020). Bio-management Options for Ecosystem Services, Carbon Sequestration and Climate Change Adaptation in Saline Environment. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 10(7), 11-33.
Review Article


Szabolcs I. Salt-affected soils. Florida, USA,CRC Press. 1989;274.

Qadir M, Tubeileh A, Akhtar J, Larbi A, Minhas PS, Khan MA. Productivity enhancement of salt -affected environments through crop diversification. Land Degradation and Development. 2007;19:429-453.

Ram J, Garg VK, Toky OP, Minhas PS, Tomar OS, Dagar JC, Kamra SK. Biodrainage potential of Eucalyptus tereticornis for reclamation of shallow water table areas in North-West India. Agroforestry System. 2007;69:147-165.

Toky OP, Angrish R, Datta KS, Arora V, Rani C, Vasudeven P, Harris PJC. Biodrainage for preventing waterlogging and concomitant wood yield in arid agro-ecosystems in North-Western India. Journal of Scientific Industrial Research. 2011;70:639-644.

Wicke B, Edward SWM, Akanda R, Stille L, Singh RK, Awan AR, Mahmood K, Faaij APC. Biomass production in agroforestry and forestry systems on salt affected soils in South asia: Exploration of the GHG balance and Economic performance on three case studies. 2013;127:324-334.

MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). Ecosystems and human well-being: Biodiversity synthesis. Washington, D.C.: World Resources Institute; 2005.

Turner WR, et al. Global biodiversity conservation and the alleviation of poverty. Bioscience. 2012;62:85-92.

Jose S. Agroforestry for Ecosystem Services and Environmental Benefits. Springer Science, The Netherlands. 266p. Forest Ecology and Management. 2009; 133:231-247.

FAO. Global forest resources assessment 2010. Main report. FAO Forestry Paper 163. Rome; 2010.

Lal R. The potential for soil carbon sequestration”, ln: Nelson, GC (eds.), Agriculture and Climate Change: An Agenda for Negotiation in Copenhagen, Brief 5, Focus 16, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC; 2009.

Jose S, Bardhan S. Agroforestry for biomass production and carbon sequestration: An overview. Agroforestry System. 2012;86:105-111.

FAO. The state of food insecurity in the world. High food prices and food security threats and opportunities. Rome; 2008.

Wicke B, Smeets E, Dornburg V, Vashev B, Gaiser T, Turkenburg W, Faaij A.The global technical and economic potential of bioenergy from salt-affected soils. Energy & Environmental Science. 2011;4:2669-2680.

Oldeman LR, Hakkeling RT A Sombroek WG. World map of the status of human‐induced soil degradation ‐ An explanatory note ‐ Global Assessment of Soil Degradation, GLASOD. Wageningen: International Soil Reference and Information Centre; Nairobi: United Nations Environmental Programme. Retrieved 24.10; 2008.

IAB. India Agriculture in Brief, 27th Edition, Directorate of Economics and Statistics Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture of India, New Delhi. 2000;36.

Qureshi AS, PG McCornick, Qadir M, Aslam Z. Managing salinity and waterlogging in the Indus Basin of Pakistan. Agricultural Water Management. 2008;95:1-10.

Marcar NE, Khanna PK. Reforestration of salt affected and acid soil. Ln: Nambiar EK, Sadanandan Brown AG (eds) Management of Soil, Nutrient and water in Tropical Plantation Forests. ACIAR Monograph No 43, Canberra, Australia; 1997.

Marcar N, Ismail S, Hossain A, Ahmad R. Trees, shrubs and grasses for saltlands: An annotated bibliography. ACIAR Monograph No. 56. ACIAR, Canberra. 1999;316.

IRRI. Increasing productivity of intensive rice systems through site-specific nutrient management, Dobermann A, Witt C, Dawe D (Eds), Enfield, N.H. (USA) and Los Baños (Philippines): Science Publisherspp 410. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). 2004;410.

Gupta SR, Sinha A, Rana RS. Biomass dynamics and nutrient cycling in a sodic grassland. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 1990;16:57–70.

Setter TL, Waters I, Sharma SK, Singh KN, Kulshreshtha N, Yaduvanshi NPS, Ram PC, Singh BN, Rane J, MC Donald G, Khabz-Saberi H, Biddolph TB, Wilson R, Barclay I, Mclean R, Cakir M. Review of wheat improvement for waterlogging tolerance in Australia and India: The importance of anaerobiosis and element toxicities associated with different soils. Journal Annals of Botany. 2009;103:221-235.

Qureshi RH, Barrett-Lennard EG. Saline Agriculture for Irrigated Land in Pakistan: A Handbook. Monograph No. 50, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra. 1998;142.

Minhas PS, Dagar JC. Agroforestry uses of inland salt-affected landscapes. CAB Review: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources. 2007;2:10.

Singh AK. Nutrient management in problem soils, ln: Enhancing Nutrient Use Efficiency in Problem Soils. Singh G, Qadir Ali, Yaduvanshi NPS and Dey P (eds.), CSSRI, Karnal, India. 2009;1-21.

Singh G, Gill HS. Ameliorative effect of tree species on characteristics of sodic soils at Karnal. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 1992;62:142–146.

Qadir M, Qureshi RH, Ahmad N. Amelioration of calcareous saline-sodic soils through phytoremediation and chemical strategies. Soil Use Management. 2002;18:381–385.

Sinha SK, Srivastava HS, Mishra SN. Effect of lead on nitrate reductase activity and nitrate assimilation in pea leaves. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae. 1988; 57:457–463.

Chaudhary AA, Hameed M, Ahmed R, Hussain A. Phytosociological studies in Chhumbi Surela Wild Life Sanctuary, chakwal, Pakistan. Species diversity. International Journal of Agricultural Biology. 2001;3:369-374.

Marcar N, Crawford D. Trees for saline landscapes, rural industries research and development corporation (RIRDC), Canberra, Australian Capital Territory; 2004.

Zhang J, Xing S, Li J, Makeschin F, Song Y. Agroforestry and its application in amelioration of saline soils in eastern China coastal region. Forestry Studies in China. 2004;6:27‐33.

Kaur B, Gupta SR, Singh G. Carbon storage and nitrogen cycling in silvi-pastoral systems on a sodic soil in northwestern India. Agroforestry Systems. 2002a;54:21-29.

Kaur B, Gupta SR, Singh G. Bioamelioration of a sodic soil by silvopastoral system in northwestern India. Agroforestry Systems. 2002b;54:13-20.

Singh AN, Raghubanshi AS, JS Singh. Plantations as a tool for mine spoil restoration. Current Science. 2002;82: 1436-1441.

Tripathi KP, Singh B. The role of revegetation for rehabilitation of sodic soils in semi-arid sub tropical forest, India. Restoration Ecology. 2005;13:29-38.

Tomar OS, Minhas PS, Sharma VK, Singh YP, Gupta RK. Performance of 31 tree species and soil conditions in a plantation established with saline irrigation. Forest Ecology and Management. 2003;177:333-346.

Singh G, Singh NT. Mesquite for the revegetation of salt lands, Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal. 1992;24.

Singh; 1995.

Singh G, Singh NT, Dagar JC, Singh H, Sharma VP. An evaluation of agriculture, forestry and agroforestry practices in a moderately alkali soil in northwestern India. Agroforestry System. 1997;37:279–295.

Ram J, Dagar JC, Singh G, Lal K, Tanwar VK, Shoeran SS, Kaledhonkar MJ, Dar SR, Kumar M . Biodrainage ecofriendly technique for combating waterlogging and salinity. Technical Bulletin: CSSRI/Karnal/9/2008;24.

Akram NA, Shahbaz M, Ashraf M. Nutrient acquisition in differentially adapted populations of Cynodondactylon(L.) Pers. and Cenchrusciliaris (L.) under drought stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2008; 40:1433-1440.

Chhabra R, Thakur NP. Biodrainage using trees to control waterlogging and secondary salinization in canal irrigated areas. Proceedings National Conferences on salinity management in agriculture. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute. Karnal, India; 1998.

Dagar JC. Opportunities for alternate land uses in salty and water scarcity areas. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2009;35:53-66.

Kumar M. Waterlogging control and carbon sequestration through biodrainage. PhD thesis, Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra. 2012;253.

Ram J, Garg VK, Toky OP, Minhas PS, Tomar OS, Dagar JC, Kamra SK. Biodrainage potential of Eucalyptus tereticornis for reclamation of shallow water table areas in north-west India. Agroforestry System. 2007;69:147-165.

Ram J, Dagger JC, Lal K, Singh G, Toky OP, Tanwar VS, Dar SR, Chauhan MK. Biodrainage to combat waterlogging, increase farm productivity and sequester carbon in central command areas of northwest India. Current Science. 2011;100:1673–1680.

Haines-Young RH, Potschin M. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Raffaelli, D. & C. Frid (eds.): Ecosystem Ecology: A new synthesis. BES Ecological Reviews Series, CUP, Cambridge. 2010;110-139.

Peh KSH, Balmford AP, Bradbury RB, Brown C, Butchart SHM, Hughes FMR, Statters field AJ, Thomas DHL, Walpole M, Birch JC. Rapid assessment of ecosystem services at sites of biodiversity conservation importance. Ecosystem Services. 2013;7.

Mace GM et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2012;27:19-26.

De Groot RS, Wilson M, Boumans R. A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics. 2002;41:393–408.

Kuiper L, Probos O. Biosaline (agro) forestry: A literature review. Biomass upstream stuurgroep. 2005;17.

Kumar M. Waterlogging control and carbon sequestration through biodrainage. PhD thesis, Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra. 2014;253.

Palm C, Sanchez P, Ahamed S, Awiti A. Soils: A contemporary perspective. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2007;32:99-129.

Gill HS, Abrol IP. Afforestation and amelioration of salt-affected soils in India. In: The productive use of saline land (eds. Davidson, N. and Galloway, R.). Proceedings of a workshop held in Perth, Western Australia. ACIAR Proceedings. 1993;42:23-27.

Dagar JC, Singh G, Singh NT. Evaluation of forest and fruit trees used for rehabilitation of semiarid alkali/sodic soils in India. Arid Soil Research & Rehabilitation. 2001;15:115-133.

Dutton RW (eds.) Prosopis Species: Aspects oftheir Value, Research and Development. CORD, University of Durham, Durham, UK; 1992.

Mishra A, Sharma SD, Khan GH. Improvement in physical and chemical properties of sodic soil by 3, 6, and 9 years old plantation of Eucalyptus tereticornis Bio rejuvenation of sodic soil. Forest Ecology Management. 2003;184: 115124.

Jenkinson DS, Ladd JN. Microbial biomass in soil; Measurement and turnover. In: Soil Biochemistry (E. A. Paul and J. N. Ladd, eds). 1981;5:415-471. Dekker, New York

Singh JS, Raghubanshi AS, Singh RS, Srivastava SC. Microbial biomass acts as a source of plant nutrient in dry tropical forest and savanna. Nature. 1989;338:499-500.

Yuan X, Lin X, Chu H, Yin R, Zhang H, Hu J, Zhu J. Effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 on soil enzyme activities at different nitrogen application treatments. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2006;26: 48-53.

Rietz DN, Haynes RJ. Effects of irrigation induced salinity and sodicity on soil microbial activity. Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 2003;35:845–854.

Batra L, Kumari A, Manna MC, Chhabra R. Microbiological and chemical amelioration of alkaline soil by growing Karnal grass and gypsum application. Experimental Agriculture. 1997;33:389–397.

Tripathi S, Kumari S, Chakraborty A, Gupta A, Chakrabarti K, Bandyapadhyay BK. Microbial biomass and its activities in salt-affected coastal soils.Soil Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2006;42:273-277.

Vitousek PM, Howarth RW. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur?.Biogeochemsitry. 1991;13:87-115.

Watson AJ, Bakker DCE, Boyd PW, Ridgwell AJ, Law CS. Effect of iron supply on Southern Ocean CO2uptake and implications for glacial atmospheric CO2. Nature. 2000;407:730–733.

Gruber N, Galloway JN. An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature. 2008;451:293-296.

Lal R. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Journal of Science. 2004;304:1623-1627.

Schlesinger WH. Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change. Academic Press. 1991;12: 443.

Palsaniya DR, Tewari RK, Singh R, Yadav RS, Dhyani SK. Farmer-agroforestry land use adoption interface in degraded agroecosystem of Bundelkhand region, India. Range Management and Agroforestry. 2010;31:11-19.

Harper RJ, Smettem KRJ, Tomlinson RJ. Using soil andclimatic data to estimate the performance of trees, carbonsequestration and recharge potential at the catchment scale. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 2005;45:1389–1401.

Harper RJ, Beck AC, Ritson P, Hill MJ, Mitchell CD, Barett DJ, Smetter KRJ, Mann SS. The potential of greenhouse sink to underwrite improved land mamagement. Ecological Engineering. 2007;29:329-341.

Mishra A, Sharma SD, Khan GH. Improvement in physical and chemical properties of sodic soil by 3, 6, and 9 years old plantation of Eucalyptus tereticornis Bio rejuvenation of sodic soil. Forest Ecology Management. 2003;184:115-124.

Harper RJ, Okom AEA, Stilwell AT, Tibbett M, Dean C, George SJ, Sochacki SJ, Mitchell CD, Mann SS,Dods K. Reforesting degraded agricultural landscapes with Eucalypts: Effects on carbon storage and soil fertility after 26 years. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 2012;163: 3-13.

Schoeneberger M, Bentrup G, Gooijer de H, Soolanayakamahally R, Sauer T, Brandle J, Zhou X Current D. Branching out: Agroforestry as a climate change mitigation and adaptation for agriculture. Journal of Soil and water Conservation. 2012;67:128-136.

Verchot LV, Van Noordwijk M, Kandji S, Tomich T, Ong C, Albrecht A, Mackensen J, Bantilan C, Anumpama KV, Palm C. Climate change: Linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitigation and Adaption Strategies for Global Change. 2007;12:901-918.

Schoeneberger MM. Agroforestry: Working tree for sequestering carbon on agricultural lands. Agroforestry Systems. 2009;75:27-37.

Kumar BM, PKR Nair (eds). Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems: Opportunities and Challenges. 2011; Vol. 8: Advances in Agroforestry. New York: Springer; 2011.

Nair PKR. Methodological challenges in estimating carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems. In Carbon Sequestration Potential of Agroforestry Systems: Opportunities and Challenges. Vol. 8: Advances in Agroforestry, eds. B.M. Kumar and P.K.R. Nair. 2011;3-16. New York: Springer

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. 4. 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 4: Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, eds. Eggleston H.S., Buendia L., Miwa K., Ngara T. and Tanabe K., Published: IGES, Japan; 2006.


Bergeron M, Lacombe S, Bradley RL, Whalen J, Cogliastro A, Jutras MF, Arp P. Reduced soil nutrient leaching following the establishment of tree-based intercropping systems in eastern Canada. Agroforestry Systems. 2011;83:321-330.

Eckard RJ, Grainger C, de Klein CAM. Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: Areview. Livestock Science. 2010;130:47-56.

Olson RK, Schoeneberger MM, Schmann SGA. An ecological foundation for temperate agroforestry. In North AmericanAgroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice, eds. H.E. Garrett, W.J. Rietveld, and R.F. Fisher, 31-62. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Inc; 2000.

Jose S, Holzmueller EJ, Gillespie AR. Tree-crop interactions in temperate agroforestry. In North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice. 2nd Ed., ed. H.E. Garrett, 57-73. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Inc; 2009.