Amount of Waste used for Different Purposes: A Socio-ecological Impact

Main Article Content

Arindam Ghosh
Dibyendu Pal
Amitava Biswas
S. K. Acharya

Abstract

Waste is a ceaselessly developing issue at worldwide and territorial just as at neighborhood levels. Due to vigorous globalization and product proliferation in recent years, more waste has been produced by the soaring manufacturing activities. The social ecology of waste recycling implies the structural, functional and managerial intervention of waste generation process. The specific objective of the research was to isolate and identify the system variables characterizing and the management of waste recycling process and to estimate intra and inter level of interaction amongst and between the variables for respective, inductive and interactive contribution. The present study takes a look into the approach, process and impact of ongoing waste management process, followed by the both kalyani and jalpaiguri municipalities. A set of agro-ecological, socio-economic and techno managerial factors have been developed by selecting  two sets of operating variables: Independent Variables: Age(x1), Education(x2), Family member(x3), Total cost of energy(x4), Household land(x5), Income(x6),  Expenditure of family(x7), Volume of waste generation per household(x8), Water consumption per day(x9), Total bio diversity(x10), Impact of waste management on health(x11), Impact of waste management on agriculture(x12), Impact of waste management on livestock(x13), Impact of waste management on water(x14),  Impact of waste management on soil(x15), Impact of waste management on micro flora and fauna(x16), Exposure to media(x17),Training received(x18), Participation on waste recycling programmer (x19), Perception on environmental impact of waste management(x20), Waste management at household level with value addition by percentage (x21a), Waste management at household level with value addition by percentage (x21b). Dependent variables: Volume of waste used for different purposes (y1). The following independent variables have come out with stark contribution on this consequent variable. Result suggested that in terms of variable, behavior and responses there have been stark differences between jalapaiguri and kalyani municipal areas. In kalyani, some few variables like perception of environmental impact on waste management, waste management at household level with value addition by percentage, impact of waste management on agriculture have recorded the distinct contribution on volume of waste used for different purposes and in jalpaiguri total household land, volume of waste generation from household, water consumption per day have gone in the determinant way. So, in kalyani and jalpaiguri municipal areas these variables have maximum influence on the dependent variable. Household wastes mostly are bio degradable in nature. It can be converted to organic manure which has a great nutritional value for plants and if these bio wastes can be converted into organic manure then amount of waste will be reduced. Not only bio waste but we can use non bio degradable wastes for energy production also.

Keywords:
Waste management, ecology and waste management, ecological services, policy and waste management, social ecology, waste management.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ghosh, A., Pal, D., Biswas, A., & Acharya, S. K. (2020). Amount of Waste used for Different Purposes: A Socio-ecological Impact. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 10(9), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2020/v10i930232
Section
Original Research Article

References

Alfaia RGDSM, Costa AM, Campos JC. Municipal solid waste in Brazil: A review. Journal of Waste Management and Research. 2017;35(12):1195-1209.

Nielsen Lim Aggarwal. Current organic waste recycling and the potential for local recycling through urban agriculture in Metro Manila. Waste Management and Research. 2011;29(11): 1213-1221.

Islam. A proposition for urban waste management and employment generation by Community Based Organization (CBO): Bangladesh perspective. International Proceeding of Chemical Biological and Environmental Engineering (IPCBEE). 2012;32:129-134.

John S. Sustainability based decision support system for solid waste management. International Journal of Environment and Waste Management. 2010;6(1/2):41-50.

Azevedo ARG. de Alexandre J, Pessanha LSP, Manhaes R, da ST, Brito J de, Marvila MK. Characterizing the paper industry sludge for environmentally safe disposal. Waste Management. 2019;95:43-52.

Irani k adon, Shirazifarid Benerayse. A critical interrogation of e-waste management in Canada: Evaluating performance of environmental manage-ment systems. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics. 2016;13(3).

Calcado G, Alves L, Vazquez E, Filho RDT. Construction and demolition waste aggregates: Analysis of the physical and mechanical properties of mortars. IOP Conference Series Material Science and Engineering. 2019;652:012016.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/652/1/012016

Ferronato N, Torretta V. Waste mismanagement in developing countries: A review of global issues. International journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16(6):1060.

Oliveria PSO, Antanes MLP, Cruz NC da, Rangel EC, Azevedo ARG de, Durrant SF. use of waste collected from wind turbine Blade production s an eco-friendly ingredient in morters for civil constructions. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020; 274:122948.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122948

Bartelings. Municipal solid waste management problems: An applied general equilibrium analysis. 2003;8:243.

Goel S. Municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in India: A critical review. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering. 2008;50(4):319-328.

Ghosh S. Maji T. An environmental assessment of urban drainage, sewage and solid waste management in Barddhaman municipality, West Bengal. International Journal of Environmental Sciences. 2011;2(1):92-104.