Effect of Salinity Stress on Antioxidative Enzyme Activity in the Leaves of Tolerant and Susceptible Genotypes of Groundnut

Main Article Content

Apurba Pal
Debjani Dutta
Anjan Kumar Pal
Sunil Kumar Gunri


Aims: To better understand the physiological and biochemical mechanisms in the light of antioxidative enzymes activity under salinity stress between tolerant and susceptible genotypes of groundnut.

Study Design: Completely Randomized Design.

Place and Duration of Study: The laboratory experiment was carried out in the departmental laboratory of Plant Physiology, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya (BCKV), Mohanpur, Nadia, and West Bengal during the year 2017-18.

Methodology: A controlled study was conducted to screen 26 genotypes of groundnut under 200 mM NaCl salinity stress. Fourteen-day old seedlings were subjected to salinity treatment. For this, the modified Hoagland nutrient solution containing 200 mM NaCl (osmotic potential: -0.8 MPa) was applied in each case and the pH was adjusted to 6.3. The treatments were repeated on every third day. Control set without salinity stress was also maintained similarly in each case for comparison of results.

Results: The salt tolerance index or STI of the genotypes ranged from 47.57% to 96.40%. Out of all the genotypes KDG-197 (STI= 96.40%) was found to be the most tolerant under a salinity stress of 200 mM NaCl and it was closely followed by R 2001-2 (STI=87.92%), VG 315 (STI=84.05%), TCGS 1157 (STI=77.59%) and TG 51 (STI=73.67%). While the genotypes Girnar 3 (STI= 47.57%), OG 52-1 (STI=49.09%), TVG 0856 (STI= 49.28%) and J 86 (STI= 50.66%) were the most susceptible genotypes based on their relative performance under stress in respect of total dry weight. It has been noted further that, out of the nine genotypes, enhancement of antioxidative enzyme like super oxide dismutase (SOD), guaiacol peroxidase (GPOX) and catalase (CAT) activity was recorded maximally in tolerant genotype KDG 197 (64.18%, 71.74% and 52.82% increase over control respectively) and R 2001-2 (53.68 %, 93.48% and 53.96 % increase over control respectively) but the activity of these enzyme in the four susceptible genotypes declined considerably under salinity treatment.

Conclusion: Tolerant genotypes of groundnut in general registered much higher activities of antioxidative enzymes in their leaves as compared to the susceptible genotype under high salinity stress.

Antioxidative enzyme, catalase, groundnut, guaiacol peroxidase, salinity stress, salt tolerance index, super oxide dismutase.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pal, A., Dutta, D., Pal, A. K., & Gunri, S. K. (2020). Effect of Salinity Stress on Antioxidative Enzyme Activity in the Leaves of Tolerant and Susceptible Genotypes of Groundnut. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 10(9), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2020/v10i930233
Original Research Article


Pascale SD, Ruggiero C, Barbieri G. Physiological responses of pepper to salinity and drought. JASHS. 2003;128(1): 48-54

Foolad MR. Recent advances in genetics of salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2004; 76(2):101-119.

Mittler R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends in Plant Science. 2006; 11(1):15–19.

Flowers TJ. Improving crop salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2004;55: 307–319.

Vorasoot N, Songsri P, Akkasaeng C, Jogloy S, Patanothai A. Effect of water stress on yield and agronomic characters of peanut. Songklanakarin J Sci Technol. 2003; 25:283–288.

Kaur G, Kumar S, Nayyar H, Upadhyaya HD. Cold stress injury during the pod- fillingphase in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): effects on quantitative and qualitative components of seeds. J Agron Crop Sci. 2008;194:457–464.

Ahmad P. Growth and antioxidant responses in mustard (Brassica juncea L.) plants subjected to combined effect of gibberellic acid and salinity. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2010; 56:575-588.

Thakur P, Kumar S, Malik JA, Berger JD, Nayyar H. Cold stress effects on reproductive development in grain crops: An overview. Environ Exp Bot. 2010;67: 429–443

Mantri N, Patade V, Penna S, Ford R, Pang E. Abiotic stress responses in plants: present and future. In: Ahmad P, Prasad MNV (eds) Abiotic stress responses in plants: metabolism, productivity and sustainability. Springer, New York; 2012.

Ahmad P. Hakeem KR, Kumar A, Ashraf M, Akram NA. Salt induced changes in photosynthetic activity and oxidative defense system of three cultivars of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Afr J Biotechnol. 2012; 11:2694–2703.

Kader MALS. Cytosolic calcium and pH signaling in plants under salinity stress. Plant Signal Behav. 2010; 5(3):233-238.

Chhabra R. Kamra SK. Management of salt affected soils. In: Extended summaries, international conference on managing natural resources for sustainable agricultural production in the 21st century. Indian Society of Soil Science. 2000; 47-49.

Jamil A. Riaz S. Ashraf M. Foolad MR. Gene expression profiling of plants under salt stress. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2011;30(5): 435-458.

Hunshal CS, Viswanath DP, Chimmad VP, Gali SK. Performance of groundnut genotypes under saline water irrigation. Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities.1991; 16:116-117.

Akram NA, Shafiq F, Ashraf M. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): A prospective legume crop to offer multiple health benefits under changing climate. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2018; 17:1325-1338.

Karra G, Nadenla R, Shireesh KR, Srilatha K, Mamatha P, Umamaheswar RV. An overview on Arachis hypogaea plant. International Journal of Phyrmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2013;4(12):4508-4518.

FAOSTAT data; 2018.


Lakshman SS, Rahaman S, Jana AK. Effect of salinity on growth, yield and yield attributes of summer groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in coastal saline belts of West Bengal, Adv. Res. J. Crop Improv. 2011; 2(2):178-184.

Girdhar IK, Bhalodia PK, Misra JB, Girdhar V, Dayal D. Performance of groundnut Arachis hypogaea L. as influenced by soil salinity and saline water irrigation in black clay soils. Journal of Oilseeds Research. 2005; 22:183–187.

Nithila S, Durga DD, Velu G, Amutha R, Rangaraju G. Physiological evaluation of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties for salt tolerance and amelioration for salt stress. Research Journal of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences. 2013; 1:1-8.

Vinocur B, Altman A. Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: Achievements and limitations. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2005; 16:123–132.

Noctor G, Foyer C. Ascorbate and glutathione: Keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1998; 49:249–279.

Chauhan MP. Singh IS. Variability estimates and identifying chick pea genotypes for yield and yield attributes in salt affected soil. Legumes Res. 2000; 23:199-200.

Epstein E. Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives. John Wiley and Sons, New York; 1972.

Bohm W. Methods of studying root systems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. 1979;95-114.

Chen C, Tao C, Peng H, Ding Y. Genetic analysis of salt stress responses in Asparagus Bean (Vigna unguiculata (L.) ssp. Sesquipedalis Verdc.). Journal of Heredity. 2007; 98:655- 665.

Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK. Superoxide dismutase. I. Occurrence in higher plants. Plant Physiology. 1977;59: 309-314.

Siegel BZ, Galston AW. The isoperoxidases of Pisum sativum. Physiologia Plantarum.1967;42:212-226.

Goth L. A simple method for determination of serum catalase activity and revision of reference range. Clinica Chimica Acta. 1991;196;143-151.

Bakht J, Basir A, Shafi M, Khan MJ. Effect of various levels of salinity on sorghum at early seedling stage in solution culture. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture. 2006;22:17-21.

Munns R, James KA, Lauchli A. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2006;57: 1025-43.

Ashraf M, Athar HR, Harris PJC, Kwon TR. Some prospective strategies for improving crop salt tolerance. Advances in Agronomy. 2008; 97:45-110.

Ashraf M. Biotechnological approach of improving plant tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnology Advances. 2009;27:84-93.

Achakzai AK, Kayani SA. Hanif Z. Effect of salinity on uptake of micronutrients in sunflower at early growth stage. Pak. J. Bot. 2010; 42:129-139.

Akram M, Ashraf MY, Ahmad R, Waraich EA, Iqbal J, Mohsan M. Screening for salt tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids at an early stage. Pak. J. Bot. 2010; 42: 141-151.

Dioniso-Sese ML. Tobita S. Effects of salinity on sodium content and photosynthetic responses of rice seedlings differing in salt tolerance. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2000;157:54-58.

Suárez DL, Lebron I. Water quality criteria for irrigation with high saline water. In: Towards the rational use of high salinity tolerant plants (Leith H, Al-Masoom A., eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. 1993; 389-397.

Hajer AS, Malibari AA, Al-Zahrani HS, Almaghrabi OA. Responses of three tomato cultivars to sea water salinity 1. Effect of salinity on the seedling growth. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2006;5: 855-861.

Ahmad P, Sharma S. Salt stress and phyto-biochemical responses of plants. Plant Soil Environ. 2008;54:89–99.

Ahmad P, Jaleel CA, Salem MA, Nabi G, Sharma S. Roles of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in plants during abiotic stress. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2010; 30:161–175.

Ahmad P, Jaleel CA, Sharma S. Antioxidative defense system, lipid peroxidation, proline metabolizing enzymes and biochemical activity in two genotypes of Morus alba L. Subjected to NaCl stress. Russ J Plant Physiol. 2010; 57:509–517.

Greenway H, Munns R. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in non-halophytes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 1980; 31:149–190.

Cheeseman JM. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol. 1988;87: 547–550.

Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Free radicals in biology and medicine, 2nd edn. Clarendon, Oxford; 1989.

McKersie BD, Leshem YY. Stress and stress coping in cultivated plants. Kluwer Academic Publishes, Dordrecht; 1994.

Panda SK. Oxidative response of green gram seeds under salinity stress. Indian Journal Plant Physiology. 2001;6: 438-440.

Sairam RK, Srivastava GC. Changes in antioxidant activity in subcellular fractions of tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes in response to long-term salt stress. Plant Science. 2002; 162:897–904.

Gapinska M, Skłodowska M, Gabara B. Effect of short- and long-term salinity on the activities of antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in tomato roots. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2008;30:11-18.

Rout NP, Shaw BP. Salt tolerance in aquatic macrophytes: Possible involvement of the antioxidative enzymes. Plant Sci. 2001;160:415–423.

Sairam RK, Rao KV, Srivastava GC. Differential response of wheat genotypes to long term salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Science. 2002;163: 1037-1046.

D’Souza MR. Devaraj VR. Biochemical responses of Hyacinth bean (Lablab purpureus) to salinity stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2010; 32:341–353.

Syeed S, Khan NA. Activities of carbonic anhydrase, catalase and ACC oxidase of mung bean (Vigna radiata) are differentially affected by salinity stress. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment. 2004;2:241-249.

Kumari GJ, Reddy AM, Naik ST, Kumar SG, Prasanthi J, Sriranganayakulu G. Jasmonic acid induced changes in protein pattern, antioxidative enzyme activities and peroxidase isozymes in peanut seedlings. Biologia Plantarum. 2006;50: 219–226.

Khan MH, Singh LB, Panda SK. Changes in antioxidant levels in Oryza sativa L. roots subjected to NaCl-salinity stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2002;24: 145-148.

Jogeswar G, Pallela R, Jakka NM. Antioxidative responses in different sorghum species under short term salinity stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2006; 28:465-475.