Main Article Content
Consolidating on farmers’ agro-ecological knowledge to design environmental-friendly agricultural systems is crucial given the environmental impact of commercial agriculture. The study aimed at assessing the awareness level of the respondents on biodiversity conservation, their biodiversity conservation information source(s), respondents’ information seeking behaviour and their perception towards biodiversity conservation. A survey was conducted on 120 respondents using simple random sampling procedure. Data collected were analysed using frequency distributions, and composite index analytical technique. Findings revealed that all of the respondents had average to high level of awareness of biodiversity conservation practices. Findings also revealed that the information on biodiversity conservation were mostly gotten from friends/neighbors, other farmers, radio/television and internet/electronic mails. The respondents had very positive or favourable perception of biodiversity conservation but biodiversity conservation information seeking behaviour of the respondents was not quite high. Six (6) independent variables contributed a multiple correlation influence (R= 0.606) on the respondents’ perception on biodiversity conservation. However, awareness of biodiversity conservation (b = 0.598, t = 6.882, P = 0.000) was found to significantly and statistically influence the respondents’ perception on biodiversity conservation. These findings are crucial for policy orientations, research and development to efficiently support the implementation of more environmental-friendly farming systems in the study area.
Juan Antonio Herrera Izaguirre. United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity; 1992.
Stoeckli S, Birrer S, Zellweger-Fischer J, Balmer O, Jenny M, Pfiffner L. Quantifying the extent to which farmers can influence biodiversity on their farms. Agricultural Ecosystem Environment. 2017;237:224–233.
Aju PC, Ezeibekwe IO. Understanding and appreciating the need for biodiversity conservation in Nigeria. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 2010;4(24): 2605-2608.
Nsengimana V, Habimana O, Ngarukiye V. Knowledge, attitudes and awareness of pre-service teachers on biodiversity conservation in Rwanda. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 2017;12(4):643-652.
Anwadike BC. Biodiversity conservation in Nigeria: Perception, challenges and possible remedies. Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research; 2020.
Rands MRW, William Adams M, Bennun Stuart L, Butchart HM, Clements A, Coomes A, Abigail Entwistle, Ian Hodge, Kapos V, Jörn Sharleman PW, William Sutherland J, Bhaskar Vira. Biodiversity conservation: Challenges beyond 2010. Science. 2010;329.
Hungerford HR, Volk TL. Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education. 1990;21:8-21.
Mart´ın-Lo´pez B, Iniesta-Arandia I, Garc´ıa-Llorente M, et al. Uncovering ecosystem services bundles through social preferences. PLoS One. 2012;7:e38970.
Bennett NJ, Roth R, Klain SC. Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2016;31:56-66.
Allendorf TD, Aung M, Songer M. Using residents’ perceptions to improve park-people relationships in Chatthin Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar. Journal of Environmental Management. 2012;99:36-43.
Umoh GS, Udo EJ, Solomon VA, Edet GE, Uwem CA, Okoro G, Bassey N, Akpan DO, Atairet E. Adaptation to climate change. Agricultural Ecosystems and Gender Dimensions. www.xlibrispublishing.co.UK; 2013.
Ekong EE. An introduction to rural sociology. Dove Educational Publishers, 80 Wellington Bassey Way, Uyo, Nigeria; 2013.
John Heinz III H. Center for Science, Economics, and the Environment. The hidden costs of coastal hazards: Implications for risk assessment and mitigation. Washington, DC: Island Press. 2000;220. ISBN: 1-55963-756-0.
Oniah MO, Tiku NE, Agbono EA. Technical inefficiency in small-scale swamp rice production enterprises in Cross River state of Nigeria; Estimation, causes and policy implementation. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Extension. 2008;8(1,2):1-8.
Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A, Bartuska A, Baste IA, Bilgin A, Brondizio E, Chan KMA, Figueroa VE, Duraiappah A, Fischer M, Hill R, Koetz T, Leadley P, Lyver P, Mace GM, Martin-Lopez B, Okumura M, Pacheco D, Pascual U, Pérez ES, Reyers B, Roth E, Saito O, Scholes RJ, Sharma N, Tallis H, Thaman R, Watson R, Yahara T, Hamid ZA, Akosim C, Al-Hafedh Y, Allahverdiyev R, Amankwah E, Asah TS, Asfaw Z, Bartus G, Brooks AL, Caillaux J, Dalle G, Darnaedi D, Driver A, Erpul G, Escobar-Eyzaguirre P, Failler P, Fouda AMM, Fu B, Gundimeda H, Hashimoto S, Homer F, Lavorel S, Lichtenstein G, Mala WA, Mandivenyi W, Matczak P, Mbizvo C, Mehrdadi M, Metzger JP, Mikissa JB, Moller H, Mooney HA, Mumby P, Nagendra H, Nesshover C, Oteng-Yeboah AA, Pataki G, Roué M, Rubis J, Schultz M, Smith P, Sumaila R, Takeuchi K, Thomas S, Verma M, Yeo-Chang Y, Zlatanova D. The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2015;14:1-16.
Saunders ME, Luck GW. Limitations of the ecosystem services versus disservices dichotomy. Conserv. Biol. 2016;30:1363-1365.
Chevillat V, Balmer O, Birrer S, Doppler V, Graf R, Jenny M, Pfiffner L, Rudmann C, Zellweger-Fischer J. Comprehensive advice increases the quality and quantity of ecological compensation areas. Agricultural Research Switzerland. 2012;3(2):104–111.