Perceived Climate Resilience and Adoption of Cocoa Agroforestry in the Forest-Savannah Transition Zone of Ghana

Main Article Content

Ishmael Hashmiu


Aims: Agroforestry is globally acknowledged as an essential component of climate-smart agriculture. Nevertheless, agroforestry adoption is low, and research is lacking on how farmers perceive the climate-related benefits of agroforestry and the implications of such perceptions on adoption. This paper assessed farmer perspectives on the effectiveness of agroforestry in enhancing the climate resilience of cocoa, and the extent to which such perceptions (in conjunction with socioeconomic factors) influence farmers’ decision to adopt cocoa agroforestry or otherwise.

Study Design: A cross-sectional survey design involving households practicing different cocoa landuse systems (agroforestry vs. full-sun monoculture) was used.

Methodology: Data were collected using structured questionnaire administered to 240 randomly selected cocoa-farming household heads.

Place and Duration of Study: The study took place in 12 rural communities in the Forest-Savannah Transition Zone of Ghana from March to September 2017.

Results: Findings indicated that while farmers unanimously acknowledged the effectiveness of cocoa agroforestry in enhancing resilience to excessive dry season temperatures, their perceptions in terms of resilience to drought differed, and were largely shaped by the kind of shade trees integrated. Overall, the majority of household heads perceived agroforestry to be the most beneficial strategy for enhancing the climate resilience of farmers. This perception significantly influenced households’ decision to adopt cocoa agroforestry, in conjunction with socioeconomic factors such as social network, sex of the household head, sex distribution of the household, and off-farm income.

Conclusion: Social network and farmers’ perception of the effectiveness of agroforestry in enhancing climate resilience are the key determinants of cocoa agroforestry adoption in the FSTZ of Ghana. Farmers who perceive agroforestry to be the most beneficial climate-resilient strategy in agriculture are more likely to adopt cocoa agroforestry. Social network can be used to enhance cocoa agroforestry adoption by serving as an effective communication channel for spreading information about the climate-related benefits of shade trees among farmers.

Climate resilience, farmer perceptions, cocoa, agroforestry adoption, social network, Ghana.

Article Details

How to Cite
Hashmiu, I. (2020). Perceived Climate Resilience and Adoption of Cocoa Agroforestry in the Forest-Savannah Transition Zone of Ghana. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 10(12), 149-161.
Original Research Article


FAO. Climate and food security: Risks and responses. FAO, Rome; 2016.

Schroth G, LaÈderach P, Martinez-Valle AI. Bunn C. From site-level to regional adaptation planning for tropical commod ities: Cocoa in West Africa. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl. 2017;22(6):903-927.

Läderach P, Martinez-Valle A, Schroth G, Castro N. Predicting the future climatic suitability for cocoa farming of the world's leading producer countries, Ghana and Côte d'Ivoire’. Climatic Change. 2013;119: 841-854.

Schroth G, Läderach P, Martinez-Valle AI, Bunn C. Climate vulnerability and adaptation of the smallholder cocoa and coffee value chains in Liberia. CCAFS working paper No. 134. CGIAR Climate Change and Food Security (CCAFS) Program, Copenhagen; 2015.

EPA [Environmental Protection Agency of Ghana], Climate change and the Ghanaian Economy, Policy Advice Series, Vol. 1, EPA, Accra; 2007.

Forestry Commission, Ghana National REDD+ Strategy. Forestry Commission, Accra; 2015.

Lahive F, Hadley P, Daymond AJ. The physiological responses of cacoa to the environment and the implications for climate change resilience. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development. 2019;39(5). DOI:10.1007/s13593-018-0552-0

Nunoo I, Darko B, Owusu V. Restoring degraded forest landscape for food security: Evidence from cocoa agroforestry systems, Ghana.’ In: Kumar, C., Saint-Laurent, C., Begeladze, S. and Calmon, M. (eds.). Enhancing food security through forest landscape restoration: Lessons from Burkina Faso, Brazil, Guatemala, Viet Nam, Ghana, Ethiopia and Philippines. IUCN: Gland, Switzerland. 2015;122-143.

Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Bhagwat SA, Buchori D, Faust H. et al. Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes – A review. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2011;48:619–629.

Andres C, Comoé H, Beerli A, Schneider M, Rist S, Jacobi J. Cocoa in monoculture and dynamic agroforestry. In: E. Lichtfouse (Ed.), “Sustainable Agriculture Reviews” 19, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26777-7_3

Anim-Kwapong GJ, Crimping EB. Vulnerability of agriculture to climate change: Impact of climate change on cocoa production. Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (CRIG) Report, CRIG: Akim-Tafo, Ghana; 2005.

Meijer SS, Catacutan D, Ajayi OC, Sileshi GW and Nieuwenhuis M. The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa, IJAS. 2015;13(1):40-54.

Akoto DS, Denich M, Partey, ST, Frith O, Kwaku M, Mensah AA, Borgemeister C. Socioeconomic indicators of bamboo use for agroforestry development in the Dry Semi-Deciduous Forest Zone of Ghana. Sustainability. 2018;10:2324. DOI: 10.3390/su10072324

Sanou L, Savadogo P, Ezebilo EE, Thiombiano A. Drivers of farmers’ decisions to adopt agroforestry: Evidence from the Sudanian savanna zone, Burkina Faso. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. 2019;34(2):116-133.

Kinyili BM, Ndunda E, Kitur E. Socio-economic and institutional factors influencing adoption of agroforestry in Arid and Semi-Arid (ASALs) areas of sub Saharan Africa. IJFH. 2020;6(1):8-18.

Zerihuna MF, Muchieb M, Worku Z. Determinants of agroforestry technology adoption in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Development Studies Research. 2014;1(1):382-394.

Ruf F. The myth of complex cocoa agroforests: The case of Ghana. Human Ecology. 2011;39(3):373-388.

Kabwe G, Bigsby H, Cullen R. x Why is adoption of agroforestry stymied in Zambia? Perspectives from the ground-up? AJAR. 2011;11(46):4704-4717.

Ajayi OC, Franzel S, Kuntashula E, Kwesiga F. Adoption of improved fallow technology for soil fertility management in Zambia: Empirical studies and emerging issues. Agroforestry systems. 2003;59(3): 317–326.

Mercer DE, Pattanayak SK. Agroforestry adoption by smallholders. In: Sills, E.O and Abt, K.L (Eds.) Forests in a Market Economy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. 2003;283-299.

Jerneck A, Olsson L. Food first! Theorising assets and actors in agroforestry: risk evaders, opportunity seekers and ‘the food imperative’ in sub-Saharan Africa. IJAS. 2014;12(1):1–22.

Oduniyi OS, Tekana SS. Adoption of agroforestry practices and climate change mitigation strategies in North West province of South Africa. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 2020;11(5):716-729.

Makuvaro V. Impact of climate change on smallholder farming in Zimbabwe, using a modelling approach. Thesis submitted in fulfillment of a PhD Degree in Agricultural Meteorology at the University of Free State, South Africa; 2014.

Noponen M. Opinion: The Climate change frontline: farmers and forest communities. Thomson Reuters Foundation New; 2019. Available: (accessed on 12th July 2020).

Arbuckle JG, Morton LW, Hobbs J. Understanding farmer perspectives on climate change adaptation and mitigation: The roles of trust in sources of climate information, climate change beliefs, and perceived risk. Environ Behav. 2015;47(2): 205–234.

Yaro JA. The perception of an adaptation to climate variability/change in Ghana by small-scale and commercial farmers. Regional Environmental Change. 2013;13: 1259–1272.

Abdulai I, Jassogne L, Graefe S, Asare R,Van Asten P, LaÈderach P. Characterization of cocoa production, income diversification and shade tree management along a climate gradient in Ghana. PLoS ONE. 2018; 13(4):0195777. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195777

UNDP [United Nations Development Programme. Environmental baseline report on cocoa in Ghana. UNDP Ghana Consultancy Report, UNDP, Accra; 2011.

Jarawura FX. Perceptions of drought among rural farmers in the Savelugu District in the northern Savannah of Ghana. Ghana Journal of Geography. 2014;6:102-120.

Roberts G, Parrotta J, Wreford A. Current adaptation measures and policies. In: Seppälä, R. Buck, A. & Katila, P. (eds.). Adaptation of Forests and People to Climate Change: A global Assessment Report. IUFRO World Series. IUFRO, Vienna. 2009;22:123–133.

Adjei-Nsiah S, Kermah M. Climate change and shift in cropping system: From cocoa to maize based cropping system in the Wenchi area of Ghana. British Journal of Environment & Climate Change. 2012;2(2): 137-152.

Asante WA, Acheampong E, Kyereh E. Kyereh B. Farmers' perception on climate change; its manifestations in smallholder cocoa systems and shifts in cropping pattern in the forest-savannah transitional zone of Ghana. Land Use Policy. 2017;66: 374-381.

Hirons M, Boyd E, Mcdermott C, Asare R, Morel A, Mason J, Norris K. Understanding climate resilience in Ghanaian cocoa communities–Advancing a biocultural perspective. Journal of Rural Studies. 2018;63:120-129.

Folke C, Carpenter SR, Elmqvist T, Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Walker B. Bengtsson J. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Environmental Advisory Council to the Swedish Government, Stockholm; 2002.

FAO. Building resilience for adaptation to climate change in the agricultural sector. Proceedings of a Joint FAO/OECD Workshop. FAO, Rome; 2012.

Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innova tions(5th ed.). Free Press, New York, 2003.

Maguire-Rajpaul VA, Khatun K, Hirons MA. Agricultural information’s impact on the adaptive capacity of Ghana’s Smallholder Cocoa Farmers. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. 2020; 4. DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00028

Chaudhury AS, Thornton TF, Helfgott A, Ventresca MJ, and Sova C. Ties that bind: Local networks, communities and adaptive capacity in rural Ghana. J. Rural Stud. 2017;53:214–228

Rhebergen T, Fairhurst T, Zingor S, Whitb AM. Climate, soil and land-use based land suitability evaluation for oil palm production in Ghana. European Journal of Agronomy. 2016;81:1-14.

Nketia KA, Adjadeh TA, Adiku SGK. Evaluation of some soils in the Forest-Savanna Transition and the Guinea Savanna Zones of Ghana for maize production. West African Journal of Applied Ecology. 2018;26(1):61-70.

OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. Managing Risk in Agriculture: A Holistic Approach. OECD, Paris; 2009.

Yaro JA. Is deagrarianization real? A study of livelihood activities in rural northern Ghana. Journal of Modern African Studies. 2006;44(1):125−156.

Abdulai I, Vaast P, Hoffmann MP, Asare, R, Jassogne L, Van Asten P. Cocoa agroforestry is less resilient to sub-optimal and extreme climate than cocoa in full sun. Glob Chang Biol. 2018;24(1):273-286. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13885 PMID: 28865146

UNESCO, International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) 2011. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Montreal, Candada; 2012.

Bickel G, Nord M, Price C, Hamilton W, Cook J. Guide to Measuring Household Food Security, Revised 2000. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service, Alexandria VA; 2000.

Pardoe I. Applied regression model. 2nd edition. Wiley, New Jersey; 2012.

Box GEP, Tidwell PW. Transformation of the independent variables. Technometrics. 1962;4:531-550.

Huxley P. Tropical agroforestry. Blackwell Science, Cambridge; 1999.

Wu J, Liu W, Chen C. Below-ground interspecific competition for water in a rubber agroforestry system may enhance water utilization in plants. Scientific Reports. 2016;6:19502. DOI: 10.1038/srep19502

Abdulai I. Productivity, water use and climate resilience of alternative cocoa cultivation systems. PhD Dissertation. Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany; 2017.

Zuidema PA, Leffelaar PA, Gerritsma W, Mommer L, Anten NPR. A physiological production model for cocoa (Theobroma cacao): Model presentation, validation and application. Agricultural Systems. 2005;84 (2):195–225.