Main Article Content
The continuous decrease and irrational use of water resources is the key issue for the proper application of water resources in tribal areas of Jabalpur district. This study attempts to propose a new aspect of optimum allocation of land & water resources in Jabalpur District. The minimum cultivated area that ensures food requirement and land constraint have a direct impact on water resources allocation. To conduct an accurate program for land and water resource allocation for water deficit area a multi- constraint linear programming model (LPM) was developed by implanting land resource as a constraint on water resources allocation which has to be considered by the demand of water resources in the agriculture sector. The result shows that increase in major crops area like rice, wheat, gram, maize and oilseeds crop areas against the reduction in sorghum, lentil, and sugarcane. Existing cropping intensity of the district was 150 %. To achieve the maximum profit per unit of land i.e. cropping intensity more than 200% for district, therefore an extensive measures was made for district to fix out the water demand supply gap for agriculture. In this study a user friendly Linear programming software was used to develop a model for optimum allocation of resources under seasonal and multi-crop condition for Jabalpur district. The net annual profit is increased by 9.1% under optimal allocation conditions. The sensitivity analysis of model parameter shows that the superior price of crop is the most sensitive parameter followed by the crop area. The results obtained from this study will definitely help policy makers to decide how to properly utilize and promote the water and land resources for the available area.
Khar D, Jat MK, Sunder JD. Assessment of water resources allocation options: Conjunctive use planning in a link canal command. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2007;51(2):487–506. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.09.011
Singh D, Jaiswal C, Reddy K, Singh R, Bhandarkar D. Optimal cropping pattern in a canal command area. Agricultural Water Management. 2001;50(1):1–8. Available:10.1016/s0378-3774(01)00104-4
Singh A. Optimization modeling for seawater intrusion management. J. Hydrol. 2014;508(5):43–52. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.10.042
Dasa Biswadip, Singha Ajay, Pandaa Sudhindra N, Yasuda Hiroshi. Optimal land and water resources allocation policies for sustainable irrigated agriculture. Land Use Polic. 2015;42:527–537.
Joodavi A, Zare M, Mahootchi M. Development and application of a stochastic optimization model for groundwater management: Crop pattern and conjunctive use consideration. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2015;29:1637–1648.
CGWB. District ground water information booklet, Jabalpur. A report published by Central Ground Water Board, Bhopal; 2013.
Gautam VK, Awasthi MK. Evaluation of water resources demand and supply for the districts of central narmada valley zone. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 2020; 9(1):3043-3050. Available:https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2020.902.350
Anonymous. District statistical book. District Statistics and Planning Department, Jabalpur, Govt. of M.P; 2015.
James G Larry. Principles of farm irrigation Design, John Willey and Sons Publishers, United Kingdom; 1988.
Awasthi MK, Tomar VS, Nema RK, Lodhi AS, Srivastava RN, Sharma SK. A book on water budgeting of Madhya Pradesh, college of agricultural engineering. JNKVV, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. 2018;1-150.
Nazarifar MH, Momeni R, Kanani MH, Abolhasani A. Develop a non-linear optimization model for determining optimal cropping pattern under different water regimes. Academia Journal of Biotechnology. 2017;5(9):137-146. Available:10.15413/ajb.2017.0514
Sethi Laxmi N, Panda Sudhindra N, Nayak Manoj K. Optimal crop planning and water resources allocation in a coastal groundwater basin, Orissa, India. Agricultural Water Management. 2006; 83(1):209-220.
Singh A. Optimal allocation of water and land resources for maximizing the farm income and minimizing the irrigation-induced environmental problems.Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 2017; 31(2): 1147–1154.