Assessing the Carbon Sequestration Potential of Coconut Plantation in Vellore District of Tamil Nadu, India
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change,
Agriculture, very often falls victim of climate change around the world. Adopting a cost efficient system of agricultural production with minimal environmental impacts, depends on the selection of best cropping system and associated farming practices. The coconut farming and coconut agroecosystem is one of the country’s largest agricultural systems and sectors that could substantially preserve carbon dioxide (CO2) through sequestration. Tamil Nadu state is one of the largest growers of coconut with an area of 443000 ha. In the present investigation the Vellore district was chosen as study area. Coconut data such as tree diameter and tree height were collected from the Tall (Aliyar nagar 1), Dwarf (Chowghat Orange Dwarf (COD)) and Chowghat Green Dwarf (CGD) varieties at different ages (five, fifteen, twenty and twenty-fifth years) at various plantations of Vellore district. The carbon sequestered by five, ten, fifteen, twenty and twenty-five-years old coconut tall variety trees were found to be 1.32, 1.97, 2.11, 3.10 and 3.96 tons per acre per year, respectively. Similarly, five, ten, fifteen, twenty and twenty-five-year-old coconut dwarf variety could able to sequester 1.45, 1.27, 1.58, 2.03 and 2.63 tons per acre per year, respectively in Vellore district. The C sequestration potential of ten year old coconut tree (Tall or Dwarf) were 18 to 28 kg per tree per year approximately. The fifteen years (2003-04 to 2017-18) coconut plantation of both tall and dwarf varieties in Vellore district had sequestered 1.15 million tons of carbon from the atmosphere.
- C sequestration
- coconut plantation
- climate change
How to Cite
Sierra CA, Crow SE, Heimann M, Metzler H, Schulze ED. The climate benefits of carbon sequestration. Biogeosciences. 2021;18:1029-1048.
Lal R, Follett RF, Stewart BA, Kimble JM. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change and advance food security. Soil Science. 2007;172(12)943–956.
Miller R, Shennan C. Transition from conventional to low-input agriculture changes soil fertility and biology. Calif. Agric. 2002;48:20-26.
Lal R. Carbon sequestration. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 2008;363:815–830.
Sundquist ET. The global carbon dioxide budget. Science. 1993;259:934-941.
Roupsard O, Lamanda N, Jourdan C, Navarro MNV, Mialet-serra I, Dauzat J, Sileye T. Coconut carbon sequestration Part 1 / Highlights on carbon cycle in coconut plantations. Part 1 Coconut Research and Development (CORD). 2008;24:1-14.
Naveenkumar KS, Maheswarappa HP. Carbon sequestration potential of coconut based cropping systems under integrated nutrient management practices. Journal of Plantation Crops. 2019;47(2):107-114.
Bhagya HP, Maheswarappa HP, Surekha, Bhat Ravi. Carbon sequestration potential in coconut-based cropping systems. Indian J. Hort. 2017;74(1). 2017;1-5.
Kannan Balaji, Ragunath KP, Kumaraperumal R, Jagadeeswaran R, Krishnan R. Mapping of coconut growing areas in Tamil Nadu, India using remote sensing and GIS. Journal of Applied and Natural Science. 2017;9(2):771–773.
Houghton RA. 'The future role of tropical forests in affecting the carbon dioxide concentration of the atmosphere', Ambio. 1990;19:204-209.
Alexander Clark III, Joseph R, Saucier, Henry McNab W. Total-Tree Weight, Stem Weight, and Volume Tables for Hardwood Species in the Southeast. Research Division, Georgia Forestry; 1986.
Badwal S, Singh R. Carbon sequestration estimates for forestry option under different land use scenario in India. Curr. Sci., 2002;83(11):1380-1386.
Abstract View: 393 times
PDF Download: 908 times