Student’s Willingness to Change a Pathway to Carbon Neutrality
Tonbra Inemo Seiyabo *
Department of Geography and Environment, School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
To lower human-induced carbon dioxide emissions in the atmosphere, the world must aim toward a carbon-neutral future to successfully combat climate change. The research aimed to investigate students’ willingness to change their attitude as a pathway to achieving carbon neutrality. An online survey was created using the JISC tool to examine students at the University of Salford's desire to change their behaviour to meet a carbon neutrality objective. Overall, 122 responses were received from the respondents and a non-parametric statistical approach was used to analyse the data. The Spearman’s rho correlation coefficient of respondent’s familiarity level with climate change and their willingness to change was found to be moderate negative and statistically significant at 0.001 level. Out of 122 respondents who completed the study survey, 30 (24.6%) of them said that they first learned about climate change in school, Internet and television sources came second on sources utilised for information. In addition, 93 (76.2%) of the respondents were ready to give up certain individual benefits to reduce CO2 emissions. Carbon neutrality seems like an ambitious goal for policymakers to attain; though people are willing to alter their lifestyles to reduce CO2 emissions in the areas of energy consumption, food waste, and transportation. However, they are not willing to go beyond if doing so will cost them more; people need to be made more aware of the issue and adopt a pattern to reduce wasteful lifestyles to reduce their carbon footprint, and it will require true political and widespread social commitment.
Keywords: Carbon neutrality, lifestyles, pathways, Salford
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Kılkış Ş, Krajačić G, Duić N, Rosen MA, Al-Nimr MA. Advances in integration of energy, water, and environment systems towards climate neutrality for sustainable development. Energy Conversion and Management. 2020;225:113410. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113410
Kushawaha J, Borra S, Kushawaha AK, Singh G, Singh P. Climate change and its impact on natural resources. Water Conservation in the Era of Global Climate Change. 2021;333–346. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820200-5.00002-6
Li X, Damartzis T, Stadler Z, Moret S, Meier B, Friedl M, Maréchal F. Decarbonization in Complex Energy Systems: A Study on the Feasibility of Carbon Neutrality for Switzerland in 2050. Frontiers in Energy Research. 2020;8.
Available:https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.549615
Wu X, Tian Z, Guo J. A review of the theoretical research and practical progress of carbon neutrality. Sustainable Operations and Computers. 2022;3:54–66. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2021.10.001
NRDC. What are the Effects of Climate Change: A rapidly warming planet poses an existential threat to all life on earth. Just how bad it gets depends on how quickly we act; 2022. Available:https://www.nrdc.org/stories/what-are-effects-climate-change#weather
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for policymakers in: Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global. Geneva; 2018.
Rebecca Lindsey. Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide; 2023. Available:https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon dioxide#:~:text=Without%20carbon%20dioxide%2C%20Earth's%20natural,causing%20global%20temperature%20to%20rise
Huang MT, Zhai PM. Achieving Paris Agreement temperature goals requires carbon neutrality by the middle century with far-reaching transitions in the whole society. Advances in Climate Change Research. 2021;12(2):281–286.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2021.03.004
Laurie Goering. Forget net-zero: meet the small-nation, carbon-negative club; 2021. Available:https://news.trust.org/item/20211103163336-kgu4r
Chen L, Msigwa G, Yang M, Osman AI, Fawzy S, Rooney DW, Yap PS. Strategies to achieve a carbon neutral society: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters; 2022. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01435-8
University of Reading. How will we get to carbon net zero as individuals and a society? - Connecting Research; 2021. Available:https://research.reading.ac.uk/research-blog/how-will-we-get-to-carbon-net-zero-as-individuals-and-a-society/
UNFCCC. Paris Agreement. United Nations Treaty Collection, Chapter XXVII 7. d. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; 2015. Available:https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
Reichl J, Cohen JJ, Klöckner CA, Kollmann A, Azarova V. The drivers of individual climate actions in Europe. Global Environmental Change. 2020;71:102390. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102390
Dubois G, Sovacool B, Aall C, Nilsson M, Barbier C, Herrmann A, Bruyère S, Andersson C, Skold B, Nadaud F, Dorner F, Moberg KR, Ceron JP, Fischer H, Amelung D, Baltruszewicz M, Fischer J, Benevise F, Louis VR, Sauerborn R. It starts at home. Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Research & Social Science. 2019;52:144–158. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.001
Whitmarsh L, Seyfang G, O’Neill S. Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’? Global Environmental Change. 2011;21(1):56–65. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.011
University of Salford. (n.d.). Our location Retrieved June 11, 2022, from Available:https://www.salford.ac.uk/international/our-location
University of Salford Profile and Courses. (n.d.). Retrieved June 11, 2022, from Available:https://www.studyinuk.com/profiles/university/salford/
Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Berent MK, Carson RT, Hanemann WM, Kopp RJ, Mitchell RC, Presser S, Ruud PA, Smith VK, Moody WR, Green MC, Conaway M. The Impact of “No Opinion” Response Options on Data Quality. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2002;66(3):371–403. Available:https://doi.org/10.1086/341394
Grendall P, Davies K. Why Skipping May be Bad for You: A Test of SkipPattern Compliance in A Self-Completion Questionaire. Journal of Asia Pacific Marketing. 2003;2(1):75-89.
Berndt AE. Sampling Methods. Journal of Human Lactation. 2020;36(2):224– 226.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420906850
Kitt S, Axsen J, Long Z, Rhodes E. The role of trust in citizen acceptance of climate policy: Comparing perceptions of government competence, integrity, and value similarity. Ecological Economics. 2021;183:106958. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOLECON.2021.106958
Lorenzoni I, Nicholson-Cole S, Whitmarsh L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change. 2007;17:445–459.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
IEA. Financing clean energy transitions in emerging and developing economies; 2021. Available:https://www.iea.org/reports/fnancingclean-energy-transitions-in-emerging-and-developing-economies
Accessed 29 June 2022