Evaluation of Different Juice Varieties of Grape (Vitis sp.) for Qualitative Characteristics

Disha S. K. *

Department of Fruit Science, College of Horticulture, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India.

K. Venkata Laxmi

Grape Research Station, Rajendranagar, SKLTSHU, Hyderabad, India.

Veena Joshi

College of Horticulture, SKLTSHU, Mulugu, Siddipet, India.

K. Aparna

MFPI Quality Control Laboratory, PJTSAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India.

Bhagyashali V. Hudge

College of Horticulture, SKLTSHU, Mojerla, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


The present investigation was conducted at College of Horticulture, Rajendranagar, during the year 2023. The experiment was laid out in completely randomized design. The research experiment was conducted to evaluate qualitative parameters of different juice varieties of grape. The results revealed that maximum TSS (21.05 ⁰B) and brix/acid ratio (42.96) were recorded in T1 – H-516. Maximum pH was recorded in T6 – Manjari Medika (4.03) and highest titrable acidity was recorded in T5 – Gulabi X Bangalore Purple (0.71%). Reducing sugars were highest in T1 – H-516 (17.24%), whereas total sugars were maximum in T4 – Concord (28.56%). Juice recovery was recorded maximum in T6 – Manjari Medika (71.80 %).

Keywords: Juice varieties, parameters of juice, grape juice, fruit crops

How to Cite

Disha S. K., Laxmi , K. V., Joshi , V., Aparna , K., & Hudge , B. V. (2023). Evaluation of Different Juice Varieties of Grape (Vitis sp.) for Qualitative Characteristics. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(11), 681–686. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i113213


Download data is not yet available.


Keller M. The science of grapevines. Academic press; 2020.

Winkler AJ. General viticulture. Univ of California Press; 1965.

Venkitasamy C, Zhao L, Zhang R, Pan Z. Grapes. In Integrated processing technologies for food and agricultural by-products. 133-163. Academic Press; 2019.

Gurak PD, Cabral LM, Rocha-Leao MHM, Matta VM, Freitas SP.. Quality evaluation of grape juice concentrated by reverse osmosis. Journal of Food Engineering. 2010;96(3):421-426.

Lunkes LBF, Hashizume LN. Evaluation of the pH and titratable acidity of teas commercially available in Brazilian market. RGO-Revista Gaucha de Odontologia. 2014;62:59-64.

Ranganna S. Handbook of analysis and quality control for fruit and vegetable products. Tata McGraw Hill Publishing Company, New Delhi. 1986;623-624.

Soni N, Patil P, Meena KC, Haldar A, Patidar DK, Tiwari R. Evaluation of different coloured varieties of grapes under nontraditional area of Malwa Plateau: A thin line tool for doubling the farmer income. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 2019;8(3):1968-1976.

Vijaya D, Reddy RG, Veena J, Mamatha KA. Evaluation of juice and wine varieties of grapes (Vitis spp) for petiole nutrient content, bud break, yield and yield components. IJCS. 2018;6(6):2739-2745.

Mehan VK, Gill MIS, Sharma, J.K. H-516: A promising grape hybrid under N-Indian conditions. In International Symposium on Grape Production and Processing. 2006; 785:109-112.

Patil SG, Karkamkar SP, Rao VS. Selection of new promising grape varieties for their commercial cultivation. Acta horticulturae. 2008;785:105.

Gill MIS, Arora NK. Performance of different grape varieties under north Indian conditions. Indian Journal of Ecology. 2009; 36(1):15-17.

Ratnacharyulu SV. Evaluation of coloured grape varieties for yield, juice recovery and quality (Doctoral dissertation, Msc Thesis. Andhra Pradesh Horticultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, AP); 2010.

Eshghi S, Salehi L, Karami MJ. Antioxidant activity, total phenolic compounds and anthocyanin contents in 35 different grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivars grown in Fars Province. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology. 2014;1(2):151-161.

Sahoo T, Verma MK, Singh SK, Thakre RRS, Jaiswal S, Arora A. Morphological and biochemical characterization of newly evolved grape (Vitis vinifera) hybrids. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2018;88(8):1280-6.

Akram MT, Qadri RWK, Jaskani MJ, Awan FS. Phenological and physicochemical evaluation of table grapes germplasm growing under arid subtropical climate of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 2020;52(3):1011-1018.

Khan AS, Ahmad N, Malik AU, Saleem BA, Rajwana IA. Pheno-physiological revelation of grapes germplasm grown in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2011;13(5):791-95.

Ghosh SN. Performance of eight grape cultivars in laterite soil of West Bengal. In International Symposium on Grape Production and Processing. 2006;785:73-78.

Kumar R, Rajan S. Grape cultivars flame seedless and Pusa Navrang can be commercially grown in north Indian conditions. In International Symposium on Grape Production and Processing. 2006; 785:69-72.

Yinshan G, Zaozhu N, Kai S, Jia Z, Zhihua R, Yuhui Z, Quan G, Hongyan G, Xiuwu G. Composition and content analysis of sugars and organic acids for 45 grape cultivars from northeast region of China. Pak. J. Bot. 2017;49(1):155-160.

Bahksh A, Riaz S, Kanwal MAJ, Nasir M, Abbas MM, Hameed A, Mahreen N, Aziz MM. Performance of various grapes cultivars under agro-climatic conditions of Central Punjab, Pakistan. JPAA. 2022; 7(3).

Shiraishi M, Fujishima H, Chijiwa H. Evaluation of table grape genetic resources for sugar, organic acid, and amino acid composition of berries. Euphytica. 2010;174:1-13.

Brar GS, Gill MIS, Arora NK, Dhaliwal HS. Fruiting behaviour of table and wine grape varieties under North Indian conditions. Journal of Applied Horticulture. 2016;18(2):160-163.

Sharma AK, Somkuwar RG, Bhange MA, Samarth RR. Evaluation of grape varieties for juice quality under tropical conditions of Pune region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences. 2018;88(4):1517-1521.

Karibasappa GS, Adsule PG. Evaluation of wine grape genotypes by National Research Centre for Grapes at their farm at Pune, Maharashtra, India. In International Symposium on Grape Production and Processing. 2006;785:497-504.