Role of Biological Carbon Mitigation in Carbon Sequestration: A Review
Issue: 2023 - Volume 13 [Issue 11]
Department of Floriculture and Landscape Architecture, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth, Akola, Maharashtra, 444001, India.
Pawan Kumar Goutam *
Department of Crop Physiology, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India.
Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Gwalior, 474001, Madhya Pradesh, India.
D. R. K. Saikanth
SRF, ICAR-ATARI, ZONE-X Hyderabad, India.
Environmental Engineering, Erode Sengunthar Engineering College, Thudupathi, Erode, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Agronomy, Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 208002, India.
Mubashir Sadiq V.
Division of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, IARI, New Delhi, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The imperative to address climate change has ushered in a growing interest in carbon sequestration as a mitigation strategy. While current methods offer some promise, they also come with a host of challenges, including technological limitations, environmental impacts, and economic barriers. This review paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the future prospects and recommendations for advancing carbon sequestration methods. Technological innovations are highlighted, particularly the advent of Direct Air Capture technologies, bioengineering for enhanced biological mitigation, and material science for more efficient storage. The policy landscape is discussed, emphasizing the need for robust carbon pricing mechanisms and international collaboration. Additionally, the paper identifies pressing areas for further research, such as long-term impact studies, the exploration of social and economic implications, and advances in monitoring and verification technologies. By synthesizing the emerging trends and potential strategies for overcoming current limitations, this paper aims to provide a cohesive roadmap for making carbon sequestration a viable and effective tool in the global effort to combat climate change.
Keywords: Sequestration, technology, policy, research, sustainability
How to Cite
Showstack R. IPCC Report calls climate changes unprecedented; 2013.
Al-Baz H. Climate resilience of refugees in Jordan (Master's thesis, University of Twente); 2021.
Das S, Mohanty S, Sahu G, Rana M, Pilli K. Biochar: A sustainable approach for improving soil health and environment. Soil erosion-current challenges and future perspectives in a changing world. 2021;1:5772.
Khangura R, Ferris D, Wagg C, Bowyer J. Regenerative agriculture—A literature review on the practices and mechanisms used to improve soil health. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):2338.
Patel HA, Byun J, Yavuz CT. Carbon dioxide capture adsorbents: chemistry and methods. ChemSusChem. 2017;10(7):1303-1317.
Griscom BW, Adams J, Ellis PW, Houghton RA, Lomax G, Miteva DA, Fargione J. Natural climate solutions. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 2017;114(44):11645- 11650.
Erans M, Sanz-Pérez ES, Hanak DP, Clulow Z, Reiner DM, Mutch GA. Direct air capture: Process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges. Energy & Environmental Science. 2022;15(4):1360-1405.
Cheah WY, Ling TC, Juan JC, Lee DJ, Chang JS, Show PL. Biorefineries of carbon dioxide: From carbon capture and storage (CCS) to bioenergies production. Bioresource Technology. 2016;215:346-356.
Conti G, Díaz S. Plant functional diversity and carbon storage–An empirical test in semi‐arid forest ecosystems. Journal of Ecology. 2013;101(1):18-28.
Wessel M, Quist-Wessel PF. Cocoa production in West Africa, a review and analysis of recent developments. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences. 2015;74(1):1-7.
Fahad S, Chavan SB, Chichaghare AR, Uthappa AR, Kumar M, Kakade V, Poczai P. Agroforestry systems for soil health improvement and maintenance. Sustainability. 2022;14(22):14877.
Bai Y, Cotrufo MF. Grassland soil carbon sequestration: Current understanding, challenges, and solutions. Science. 2022;377(6606):603-608.
Singh V, Singh A, Verma S, Rastogi M, Yadav PK, Kumar V. Evaluation of different microbial inoculum on mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) growth, Development and nutrient availability. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 2022;34(20):295-301.
Bustamante MM, Roitman I, Aide TM, Alencar A, Anderson LO, Aragão L, Vieira IC. Toward an integrated monitoring framework to assess the effects of tropical forest degradation and recovery on carbon stocks and biodiversity. Global change biology. 2016;22(1):92-109.
Hartmann J, West AJ, Renforth P, Köhler P, De La Rocha CL, Wolf‐Gladrow DA, Scheffran J. Enhanced chemical weathering as a geoengineering strategy to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide, supply nutrients, and mitigate ocean acidification. Reviews of Geophysics. 2013;51(2):113-149.
Harvey CA, Chacon M, Donatti CI, Garen E, Hannah L, Andrade A, Wollenberg E. Climate‐smart landscapes: opportunities and challenges for integrating adaptation and mitigation in tropical agriculture. Conservation Letters. 2014;7(2):77-90.
Renn O, Roco MC. Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance. In Emerging Technologies. Routledge. 2020;321-359.
Fawzy S, Osman AI, Doran J, Rooney DW. Strategies for mitigation of climate change: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2020;18:2069-2094.
Lackner KS, Brennan S. Envisioning carbon capture and storage: expanded possibilities due to air capture, leakage insurance, and C-14 monitoring. Climatic change. 2009;96(3):357-378.
Matt DT, Pedrini G, Bonfanti A, Orzes G. Industrial digitalization. A systematic literature review and research agenda. European Management Journal. 2023; 41(1):47-78.
Guinotte JM, Fabry VJ. Ocean acidification and its potential effects on marine ecosystems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2008;1134(1):320-342.
Smith P, Haberl H, Popp A, Erb KH, Lauk C, Harper R, Rose S. How much land‐based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?. Global change biology. 2013;19(8):2285- 2302.
Stechel EB, Miller JE. Re-energizing CO2 to fuels with the sun: Issues of efficiency, scale, and economics. Journal of CO2 Utilization. 2013;1:28-36.
Claeys G, Tagliapietra S, Zachmann G. How to make the European green deal work. Brussels, Belgium: Bruegel; 2019.
Shen M, Huang W, Chen M, Song B, Zeng G, Zhang Y. (Micro) plastic crisis: un-ignorable contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions and climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;254:120138.
Zeman FS, Lackner KS. Capturing carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere. World Resource Review. 2004;16(2):157-172.
Maurya M, Chaurasia AK, Kumar A, Maurya CL, Bara BM, Kumar M, Rai PK. Genetic variability for seed yield and its component characters in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Allahabad agro-climatic conditions. Int. J. Recent Dev. In Engg. Tech. 2014;2(4):124-125.
Rey F, Madiès T. Addressing the concerns about carbon leakage in the implementation of carbon pricing policies: A focus on the issue of competitiveness. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics. 2021;48:53-75.
Yuan Z, Eden MR, Gani R. Toward the development and deployment of large-scale carbon dioxide capture and conversion processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2016;55 (12):3383-3419.
Glasgow HB, Burkholder JM, Reed RE, Lewitus AJ, Kleinman JE. Real-time remote monitoring of water quality: a review of current applications, and advancements in sensor, telemetry, and computing technologies. Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology. 2004;300(1-2):409-448.