Estimation of Crop-coefficients and Evapotranspiration of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Using Lysimeter and Empirical Models under Temperate Climate

Yogesh Pandey *

Division of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, CoAE&T, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K-190025, India.

Nifa Mehraj

Division of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, CoAE&T, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K-190025, India.

Sushmita M. Dadhich

Division of Soil and Water Conservation Engineering, CoAE&T, SKUAST-J, Chatha, Jammu, J&K-180009, India.

Yasmeen Akhtar

CoAE&T, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K-190025, India.

Zeenat Lateef

CoAE&T, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, Srinagar, J&K-190025, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

During Rabi 2020-21, a field experiment was conducted at SKUAST-K, Shalimar, India, focusing on field Pea (Pisum sativum L.). The aim of this study was to determine the water requirement and single crop coefficient (Kc) of pea using a lysimeter setup. Four empirical models were employed to calculate the reference evapotranspiration and were then compared with the actual crop evapotranspiration at different growth stages. The Kc values for field pea were 0.50, 0.80, 1.15, and 1.10 during the initial, development, mid-season and late season stages, respectively. The water requirement was found as 239.9 mm for the whole cropping period of the pea. Among the models, the Penman Montieth crop evapotranspiration model exhibited the closest agreement with the corresponding values obtained in the field through water balance study, yielding RMSE, RSR, and NSE values of 0.97, 9.5, and 11.6, respectively. These findings highlight the significance of using Penman Monteith crop evapotranspiration model for estimating crop evapotranspiration in temperate regions.

Keywords: Crop evapotranspiration, drainage type lysimeter, crop coefficient, pea


How to Cite

Pandey, Y., Mehraj , N., Dadhich, S. M., Akhtar , Y., & Lateef , Z. (2023). Estimation of Crop-coefficients and Evapotranspiration of Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Using Lysimeter and Empirical Models under Temperate Climate. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(11), 2751–2758. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i113443

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Incrocci L, Incrocci G, di Vita A, Pardossi A, Bibbiani C, Marzialetti P, Balendonck J. Scheduling irrigation in heterogeneous container nursery crops. Acta Hortic. 2014;1034:193-200.

Mehta R, Pandey V. Crop water requirement (ETc) of different crops of middle Gujarat. Journal of agrometeorology. 2016;18(1):83-87.

Ragab R, Evans JG, Battilani A, Solimando D. Towards accurate estimation of crop water requirement without the crop coefficient Kc: New approach using modern technologies. Irrigation and Drainage. 2017;66(4):469-477.

Dehghani Sanij H, Yamamoto T, Rasiah V. Assessment of evapotranspiration estimation models for use in semi-arid environments, Agricultural water management. 2004;64:91-106

Bormann H. Sensitivity analysis of 18 different potential evapotranspiration models to observed climatic change at German climate stations. Climatic Change. 2011;104(3-4):729-753.

Nag A, Adamala S, Raghuwanshi NS, Singh R, Bandyopadhyay A. Estimation and ranking of reference evapotranspiration for different spatial scales in India. J Indian Water Resour Soc. 2014;34(3):35-45.

Djaman K, Balde AB, Sow A, Muller B, Irmak S, N’Diaye MK, Manneh B, Moukoumbi YD, Futakuchi K, Saito K. Evaluation of sixteen reference evapotranspiration methods under sahelian conditions in the Senegal River Valley. Journal of Hydrology: regional studies. 2015;3:139-159.

Muniandy JM, Yusop Z, Askari M. Evaluation of reference evapotranspiration models and determination of crop coefficient for Momordica charantia and Capsicum annuum. Agricultural Water Management. 2016;169:77-89.

Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. UN-FAO, Rome, Italy; 1998.

Duke J. Handbook of legumes of world economic importance. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.

Prabhakara C, Iacovazzi JR, Yoo JM, Kim KM, Bell TL. A method to estimate rain rate over tropical oceans with the TRMM microwave imager radiometer. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan. 2008;86(1):203-212.

Allen RG. FAO irrigation and drainage paper; 1977.

Jensen ME. Water consumption by agricultural plants. Chapter-1. (In). Water Deficits and Plant Growth, Kozlowski T T (Ed). Academic Press, New York. 1968;II:1–22.

Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO. Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements, Irrigation Drainage Paper no. 24, FAO-ONU, Rome, Italy. 1975;168.

Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO. Crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24. FAO, Rome, Italy. 1977;144.

Ambrose JRB, Roesch SE. Dynamic estuary model performance. Journal of Environment Engineering Division. 1982;108:51–7.

Moriasi DN, Amold J, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transaction of the ASAE. 2007;50:885-900.

Shuttleworth WJ. Evaporation: Handbook of hydrology. Maidment D R, (ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York; 1992.

Hargreaves GL, Samani ZA. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl. Eng. Agric. Trans. ASAE. 1985;1(2):96–9.

Allen RG, Pruitt WO. Rational use of the FAO blaney-criddle formula. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 1986;112(2):139-155.

Ahmad L, Parvaze S, Mahdi SS, Dekhle BS, Parvaze S, Majid M, Wani FS. Comparison of potential evapotranspiration models and establishment of potential evapotranspiration curves for temperate Kashmir Valley. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2017;24(3):1-10.

Evans R, Sneed RE, Cassel DK. Irrigation scheduling to improve water- and energy- efficiencies. Pub. No., AG 452- 4, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. Evaporation. Journal of Hydrology. 1996; 45:276–84.