Assessment of Yield Potential of Paddy Variety CR 1009 Sub 1 to Impart Resilience to Farmers in NICRA Village, Thiruvarur District, Tamil Nadu, India

A. Anuratha *

Agricultural College and Research Institute, TNAU, Keezhvelur, Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu, India.

R. Ramesh

National Pulse Research Centre, TNAU, Vambam, Tamil Nadu, India.

M. Ramasubramanian

TNAU, Coimbatore , Tamil Nadu, India.

V. Radhakrishnan

Institute of Agriculture, TNAU, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India.

S. Kamalasundari

Agricultural College and Research Institute, TNAU, Chettinadu, Sivagangai District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Shibi Sebastian

ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra, TNAU, Tindivanam, Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu, India.

M. Selvamurugan

Horticultural College and Research Institute for Women, TNAU, Tiruchirappalli, Tamil Nadu, India.

V. Krishnan

Pandit Jawharlal Nehru College of Agriculture and Research Institute, Karaikal, U. T. of Puducherry, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


The study was conducted in the villages of Rayapuram and Keezhapattu in Tamil Nadu, as part of the National Innovation on Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA) project in the Needamangalam district of Thiruvarur from 2015 to 2018. These villages frequently experienced floods, particularly impacting the rabi season's crop growth and maturity. The monsoon season (September to December) contributed to about 71% of the total rainfall. A comparative analysis was carried out to assess the economic performance of the flood-resistant paddy variety CR 1009 sub 1 in contrast to the commonly grown CR 1009. Traditionally, farmers in Rayapuram and Keezhapattu favored CR 1009 due to its high market value during the monsoon period. However, they faced low income due to flooding in the rabi season. To address this challenge, scientists from KVK, Thiruvarur, recommended the flood-tolerant paddy variety CR 1009 sub 1 for cultivation during the rabi season under the "National Innovations in Climate Resilient Agriculture (NICRA)" project. Specific climate-resilient technologies, including flood-tolerant paddy variety "CR 1009 sub 1" and a high-yield, long-duration rice variety, were tested and demonstrated in the project villages to ensure rice production despite climatic variations leading to floods. It was crucial to assess how these varieties responded to climate vulnerabilities and how receptive farmers were to adopting them. Calculations were made to compare paddy productivity and economic returns under the improved technology with the traditional practices of farmers. The results indicated that the "CR 1009 sub 1" variety yielded higher harvests compared to the farmers' practices in the years 2015–16, 2016–17, and 2017–18, with increases of 12.60%, 11.69%, and 12.95% respectively. Furthermore, using improved technologies for paddy cultivation generated higher net returns of Rs. 57233, 60768, and 57728 per hectare in 2015–16, 2016–17, and 2017–18, respectively, in contrast to the farmers' practices (which yielded Rs. 49147, 50295, and 46266 per hectare in the same years). In comparison to the farmers' practices (with an average net return of Rs. 48569 per hectare and a benefit-cost ratio of 2.37), the demonstration fields showed an average net return of Rs. 58576 per hectare and a benefit-cost ratio of 2.56.

Keywords: Climate resilient paddy, CR 1009 sub 1, improved practices, economics

How to Cite

Anuratha , A., R. Ramesh, M. Ramasubramanian, V. Radhakrishnan, S. Kamalasundari, Shibi Sebastian, M. Selvamurugan, and V. Krishnan. 2023. “Assessment of Yield Potential of Paddy Variety CR 1009 Sub 1 to Impart Resilience to Farmers in NICRA Village, Thiruvarur District, Tamil Nadu, India”. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 13 (11):2870-78.


Download data is not yet available.


Fageria NK, Slaton NA and Baligar VC. Nutrient management for improving lowland rice productivity and sustainability. Advances in Agronomy, 2003;(16):80:63–152.

Hossain M, Laborte A. Differential growth in rice production in eastern India;agroecological and socioeconomic constraints. In Physiology of Stress Tolerance Rice, NDUAT and IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines. 1996;221-239.

Haefele SM and Hijmans RJ. Soil quality in rice-based rain fed lowlands of Asia: characterization and distribution Proceedings of the 26th International Rice Research Conference: Science, technology, and trade for peace and prosperity; 2007.

Koppa N, Amarnath G. Geospatial Assessment of Flood-Tolerant Rice Varieties to Guide Climate Adaptation Strategies in India. Climate.2021;9:151. Available:

Mosharaf Hossain, Swati Nayak, Girija Swain, Pavan Yeggina, and Mukund Variar. Variety-based climate-smart intervention helps smallholder farmers cope with floods in the lowlands of Odisha, Rice today, 2023.

Samui SK, Mitra S, Roy DK, Mandal AK and Saha D. Evaluation of frontline demonstration on groundnut. Journal of the Indian Society of Coastal Agricultural Research. 2000;18(2):180-183.

Sarkar RK, Panda D, Reddy JN, Patnaik SSC, Mackill DJ, Ismail AM. Performance of submergence tolerant rice genotypes carrying the Sub1 QTL under stressed and non-stressed natural field conditions. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2009;79:876–883.

Anuratha A, Vigila V, Ramasubramanian M, Ramesh R. Flood tolerant paddy variety (Swarna sub 1) impart resilience to farmers in flood prone areas of NICRA village, Thiruvarur district, Tamil Nadu, India. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2019;SP6:165-168.

Dash SR, Routray BK, Mohanty SK, Behera N. Evaluation of excess water tolerant rice varieties swarna Sub-1 and CR-1009 Sub -1 under Head to Head Project in East and South- Eastern Coastal Plain Zone of Odisha. Current Agriculture Research Journal. 2020;8(1):39-45.

Robin S, Jeyaprakash P, Amudha K, Pushpam R, Rajeswari S, Manonmani S, Ravichandran, V, Soundararajan RP, Ramanathan A and Ganesamurthy K. Rice CR1009 Sub 1 (IET 22187) - A new flood tolerant rice variety. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2019;10(3):995–1004.

Sreelakhshmi CH, Sameer CV, Kumar, Shivani D. Producvity enhancement of Pigeon pea (Cajanus canjan L.) through improved production technology. Madras Agril. J. 2012;99(4-6):185-189.

Raj AD, Yadav V, Rathod JH. (2013) Impact of front line demonstrations (FLD) on the yield of pulses. Internat. J. Scient. & Res. Public. 2013;3:1- 4.

Haque, MS. Impact of compact block demonstration on increase in productivity of rice. Maharashtra Journal of Extension Education. 2000;19(1):22-27.

Tiwari KB, Saxena A. Economic analysis of FLD of oilseeds in Chindwara. Bharatiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 2001;16(3-4):185-189.

Septiningsih EM, Pamplona MA, Darlene LS, Neeraja C, Vergara GV, Ismail AM and Mackill DJ. Development of submerge ence tolerant rice cultivars the Sub 1 locus and beyond. Ann. Bot. 2007;103:151–160.

Chauhan, NM. Impact and yield fissure inspection of gram through trainings and FLDs by KVK Tapi in Gujarat. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research and Extension. 2011;4:12-15.

Raju G, Teggelli, Zaheer Ahamed B, Anand Naik, Siddappa. Transfer of Improved technology of black gram production through Frontline Demonstrations (FLDs) in Kalaburagi region of Northern Karnataka Trends in Biosci. 2015;8(11):2814-2817.

Deka BC, Deka CK, Das P, Goswami J, Bhattacharryya C. Climate resilient technological interventions to ensure food security in flood affected area – An experience from NICRA village, Dhubri, Assam. International Journal of plant protection, 2017;10(2):442-447.

Mokidue I, Mohanty AK, Sanjay K. Correlating growth, yield and adoption of urd bean technologies. Indian J. Extn. Edu. 2011;11(2):20-24.

Samir Kumar Pandey, Dheeraj kumar, Sunil singh, Parpti singh. Promotion of Long Duration Rice Variety Swarna sub -1 through Front line demonstration in Chandauli district of Uttar Pradesh, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2018; 7(5).

Anuratha A, Ramasubramanian M, Radhakrishnan V, Kamalasundari S, Selvamurugan M, Shibi Sebastian, Ahiladevi P, Sangeetha S. Technological and Extension yield gaps in green gram in Thiruvarur district of Tamil Nadu, India. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America. 2023;54(4):12618-12623.