Groundwater Marketing Dynamics in Northern Dry Zone Farms of Karnataka: A Comparative Study (2006 to 2021)

Yamuna N *

College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad -05, India.

Mahantesh R Nayak

College of Agriculture, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad -05, India.

Rakesh N

ICAR-MGIFRI Motihari, Bihar, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Groundwater is an essential resource, but it is becoming increasingly scarce and depleting rapidly, particularly in Karnataka. As a result, groundwater markets have emerged as an alternative strategy to manage this limited resource more efficiently and equitably. These markets enable farmers who cannot afford water extraction machinery to access irrigation. This article, aims to study present status of groundwater markets, temporal depletion of water table, groundwater security, economics and factors affecting water trade in Northern Dry Zone of Karnataka, mainly to compare with the results obtained in the past study [1] to analyze changes in scenario and have historical lessons. Multi-stage random sampling technique was used to select farmers, who were then categorized into water sellers, self-users, and buyers. Primary data was collected through a structured, pre-tested schedule and analysed using descriptive and logit regression analysis. Results show that unlike earlier study, buyers in present study owned wells. Depth of borewells has increased (overall 44%), resulting in increased drilling, deepening, and pumping costs. Very few farmers (8%) acknowledged over-extraction from their farms could also contribute to groundwater insecurity. While studying economics it was found that perennial crops had the highest economic rents (260, 610Rs/hr for sellers and buyers).Reason for participation in water market has shifted from no investment capacity to water scarcity compared to earlier study. So farmers could be motivated to participate in water markets instead of relying on new wells during water shortages to encourage optimal water use and reduce negative externalities like increasing wells.

Keywords: Groundwater market, sellers, buyers, self-users, pricing


How to Cite

Yamuna N, Nayak, M. R., & Rakesh N. (2024). Groundwater Marketing Dynamics in Northern Dry Zone Farms of Karnataka: A Comparative Study (2006 to 2021). International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 14(5), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i54176

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nayak MR. Groundwater markets in Karnataka: Key issues in sustainability. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad, Karnataka (India); 2007.

Patel PM, Saha D, Shah T. Sustainability of groundwater through community-driven distributed recharge: An analysis of arguments for water scarce regions of semi-arid India. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies. 2020;29(2):170-180.

Anonymous. National compilation on dynamic ground water resources of India. Central Ground Water Board. 2020;1-401.

Wable PS, Jha MK, Murasingh S. Evaluation of groundwater resources for sustainable groundwater development in a semiarid river basin of India. Environ. Earth Sci. 2017;76(1):1-17.

Shiferaw Bekele, Addressing groundwater depletion: Lessons from India, the world’s largest user of groundwater; 2021.

Available:https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/blog/addressing-groundwater-depletion-lessons-india-worlds-largest-user-groundwater

Das A, Kashem S, Hasan M. Using market mechanism to stimulate sustainable use of the non-renewable environmental resource (groundwater) in Barind Tract of Bangladesh. Hong Kong Inst. Eng. Trans. 2021;28(1):39-48.

Varughese S, Prasad KVD. Preliminary report on the socioecology of rural groundwater markets in the gingee watershed. Climate Change and the Sustainable Use of Water Resources, Climate Change Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2012;283-29.

Shah T, Chowdhury SD. Farm power policies and groundwater markets: Contrasting Gujarat with West Bengal (1990–2015). Economic and Political Weekly. 2017;52(26):39-47.

Anonymous, District Webites of Bagalkot, Belagavi, Vijayapur Districts of Karnataka; 2020.

Available:https://bagalkot.nic.in/en/, https://belagavi.nic.in/en/, https://vijayapura.nic.in/en/

Singh KA, Chaudhary AK, Sinha DK. Groundwater marketing in Nalanda district of Bihar state: A socio-economic appraisal. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev. 2007;20(1):333-344.

Acharyya A, Ghosh M, Bhattacharya RN. Groundwater market in West Bengal, India: Does it display monopoly power? Stud. Microecon. 2018;6(2):105-129.

Kulkarni H, Shah M, Shankar PSV. Shaping the contours of groundwater governance in India. J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud. 2015;4(1):172-192.

Khan HF, Brown CM. Effect of hydrogeologic and climatic variability on performance of a groundwater market. Water Resour. Res. 2019;55(5):4304-4321.

Manjunatha AV, Anik AR, Speelman S. and Nuppenau EA. Farmers’ participation in informal groundwater market in hard rock areas of peninsular India. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev. 2014;27(1): 45-54.

Dangar S, Asoka A, Mishra V. Causes and implications of groundwater depletion in India: A review. J. Hydrol. 2021;596(1):53-56.

Saleth RM. Water markets in India: Extent and impact. Water Markets for the 21st Century, Chapter 13, Madras Institute of Development Studies, Chennai, India. 2014;239-261.