Seasonal Dynamics of Major Insect Pests of Cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.): A Field Survey in Andhra Pradesh, India
Najitha Ummer
Cocoa Research Centre, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala, 680656, India.
J. S. Minimol *
Cocoa Research Centre, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala, 680656, India.
Deepa James
Cocoa Research Centre, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala, 680656, India.
A. Aswini
Cocoa Research Centre, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala, 680656, India.
Dhanu Unnikrishnan
Cocoa Research Centre, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala, 680656, India.
Gavas Ragesh
Banana Research Station, Kannara, Kerala Agricultural University Thrissur, Kerala, 680652, India.
Nelli Harika
Cocoa Research Centre, Kerala Agricultural University, Vellanikkara, Thrissur, Kerala, 680656, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Background: Cocoa cultivation in Andhra Pradesh has expanded rapidly, and insect pests are now a leading biotic constraint on tree vigour and pod yield, with their occurrence fluctuating by season and prevailing weather.
Aims: To quantify seasonal incidence of major cocoa insect pests, test the consistency of seasonal patterns across years, and relate incidence to weather parameters.
Study Design: Three-year longitudinal roving survey from February 2023 to January 2026. Place and Duration of Study: Twelve farmer-managed cocoa farms, Eluru district, Andhra Pradesh, India (16°42′N, 81°06′E); 2023 to 2025.
Methodology: Monthly pest incidence was recorded from 100 unsprayed trees per farm. Seasons were defined as summer (February–May), monsoon (June–September) and post-monsoon (October–January). The seasonal and annual incidence of major pests in the cocoa agroecosystem was assessed. The consistency of seasonal incidence across years, the influence of the year × season interaction, and the influence of weather parameters on seasonal incidence were also statistically analysed.
Results: Conogethes punctiferalis (husk borer), Indarbela sp. (bark-eating caterpillar), Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug) and Pseudococcus longispinus (long-tailed mealybugs) were dominant in all years. Peak incidence of lepidopteran pests declined progressively, with husk borer infestation decreasing from 68.38 ± 5.55% (2023-24) to 23.02 ± 3.18% (2025-26), and bark-eating caterpillar incidence from 51.81% to 8.38%. Mealybug incidence peaked post-monsoon during the first two survey years (citrus mealybug 34.79% and 32.73%) but shifted to summer in 2025-26 (35.79%). Year × season interactions were highly significant (p < 0.01) for all four pests. Lepidopteran pests were more strongly associated with relative humidity (r = −0.46 to −0.64) than with temperature (r = 0.41–0.42). Citrus mealybug correlated negatively with rainfall (r = −0.43, p = 0.01), while long-tailed mealybug showed no significant weather association.
Conclusion: The seasonality of lepidopteran pests was directionally stable, consistently peaking in summer with declining amplitude across years, whereas both mealybug species shifted their peak incidence from post-monsoon to summer in 2025-26, a directional change not fully explained by the weather associations tested here. Seasonal structuring can therefore vary in both amplitude and direction, limiting calendar-fixed control. Monitoring should focus on the summer months for husk borers and bark-eating caterpillars, and the post-monsoon period for mealybugs. Allowance should be made for seasonal shifts in years when the weather is inconsistent.
Keywords: Cocoa, husk borer, bark eating caterpillar, citrus mealybug, long tailed mealybug seasonal pest dynamics